Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-mawatari-v6ops-464xlat-00.txt

Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com> Tue, 24 January 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1313911E807A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XW+kRDIyfAGz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.193]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40DC11E8075 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q0OHMbmb014422; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:22:37 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id q0OHMbP08385; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:22:37 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail03.kamome.nec.co.jp (mail03.kamome.nec.co.jp [10.25.43.7]) by mailsv3.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q0OHMbvj026304; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:22:37 +0900 (JST)
Received: from shoin.jp.nec.com ([10.26.220.3] [10.26.220.3]) by mail02.kamome.nec.co.jp with ESMTP id BT-MMP-528071; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:21:24 +0900
Received: from siznecatg159185 ([10.3.159.185] [10.3.159.185]) by mail.jp.nec.com with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:21:22 +0900
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <4F1E0CEB.2060007@gmail.com>
References: <4F1E0CEB.2060007@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20120125022122kawashimam@mail.jp.nec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: StarOffice21/MailClient[4.65 Step9]
From: Masanobu Kawashima <kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:21:20 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-mawatari-v6ops-464xlat-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:23:08 -0000

Hi Brian,

Thank you for your comment.

I take your point. However, a CLAT can only learn the address of an IPv6
DNS recursive server through DHCPv6 (or other way). The CLAT can not easily
discover the address of an IPv4 DNS recursive server, and it has to perform
all DNS resolution over IPv6.

The CLAT can pass this IPv6 address to downstream IPv6 hosts, but not to
downstream IPv4 hosts. As such, the CLAT should implement a DNS proxy.

Regards,
Masanobu


>> 7.4.  DNS Proxy Implementation
>> 
>>    If a router implement CLAT function, it performs DNS Proxy for IPv4
>>    hosts and IPv6 hosts in end-user network.  
>
>Why is this necessary? As far as I can see, the client could use any
>normal DNS server, because the A and AAAA records it needs are completely
>standard.
>
>Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
>
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

========================================
 NEC AccessTechnica, Ltd.               
 Product Development Department         
 Masanobu Kawashima                     
 kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com               
 http://www.necat.co.jp/                
========================================