IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] State of play

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 02 February 2016 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65661AC400; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RS9UX9InjmAw; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A901AC3F9; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3AA34930F; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9826B160043; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877E016005C; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id HuIuds2IJF44; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-161-187.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.161.187]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BB7D160043; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296134160605; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:46:37 +1100 (EST)
To: otroan@employees.org
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <201602011400.u11E0Hsd009385@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <20160201231151.25706414D77A@rock.dv.isc.org> <61DE78D0-8B8D-4BD3-B6B4-5275B118D6F5@cisco.com> <20160202035520.9932E415A9C9@rock.dv.isc.org> <FD36029E-14CD-40EC-9A59-68CDFE7DB56F@employees.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:36:02 +0100." <FD36029E-14CD-40EC-9A59-68CDFE7DB56F@employees.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:46:37 +1100
Message-Id: <20160202084637.296134160605@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zyAg9tnzk0Deo1H9E0aqGLvRJxU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 08:46:44 -0000

In message <FD36029E-14CD-40EC-9A59-68CDFE7DB56F@employees.org>, otroan@employees.org writes:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> >> When you say "v6man", I assume you mean "6man".
> > 
> > yep.
> > 
> >> I'm a little lost. I don't see the words "chair" or "question" in the =
> >> draft. Could you be more specific about what your question is?
> > 
> > Which WG should take ownership of the problem space in this draft?
> 
> is this an implementation bug, specification bug or both?

Possibly both as implementers failed to apply the simple logic of
if the mtu is limited then the tcp segment size also limited.  If
limit is applied prior to the MSS negotiation then that too is also
limited.

It's all a matter of how much hand holding should there be which
is a judgement call.

Mark

> Best regards,
> Ole
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email