IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 16 September 2009 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD593A6AA0 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vi5sjEtL72rz for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983E63A6ABA for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-179-156.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.179.156]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D86FB40D12; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:03:26 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4AB0F02D.2030904@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:03:25 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4AB00791.4040005@stpeter.im> <4A6CDE38802D481BAF82CDF30E08B75E@Javier2> <4AB095A2.2090407@gmx.de> <A7EB3517-B7DA-44D6-81FA-31B7EBAB9BD4@Isode.com> <4AB0B66D.2020405@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4AB0B66D.2020405@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:02:38 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/16/09 3:57 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> ...
>> I disagree.
>>
>> If for some reason the I-D refers to information in the (to be)
>> obsoleted information, then yes.  But this is no different than any
>> other informational reference.   However, if the I-D simply has:
>>
>> Obsoletes: RFC X
>>
>> and text:
>>     This document obsoletes RFC X.
>>
>> There is no need to have an informative reference and, in my opinion,
>> having a informative reference for just such is distracting and ought
>> to be avoided.
>> ...
> 
> You are right if there's nothing else that needs to be said.

My point was that the IMPP field is not new, however it was previously
defined in RFC 4770 rather than in RFC 2426. If someone comes to
vcardrev expecting to find all and only an update to RFC 2426, they
might be surprised by the inclusion of IMPP.

But it's not a major issue for me either way.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqw8C0ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyU/wCfamUpEg7xNdqakO5G3GHFZRo8
dOwAn0zsNlnzV9cELaahwWH39v10EUVd
=nbyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email