Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 16 September 2009 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A188F3A6936 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zr8XhI+p0J1 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68F23A6B54 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.2.167] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SrC8BQB9YXik@rufus.isode.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:20:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4AB0BBFD.2020004@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:20:46 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4AB00791.4040005@stpeter.im> <4A6CDE38802D481BAF82CDF30E08B75E@Javier2> <4AB095A2.2090407@gmx.de> <A7EB3517-B7DA-44D6-81FA-31B7EBAB9BD4@Isode.com> <4AB0B66D.2020405@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4AB0B66D.2020405@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] vcardrev nits
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:20:11 -0000

Julian Reschke wrote:

> Frequently however, a revision of spec actually makes changes, in 
> which case I would expect a "changes since rfc xxxx" section, which 
> optimally should be precise in what changed (potentially including 
> references to specific sections in the original spec).

This section is pretty much a requirement and some IESG members put 
DISCUSSes if you don't have one.