Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Tue, 03 May 2011 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1928DE0718 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jY63z4kK6B15 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE9DE06C3 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so3612105wwk.1 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9+GPbg2JjMzg+jGjaz5zBBb8+ECLdoeutfDPp/orF/c=; b=TLwXEW//S77vmNVh2CzLHUMREHLN44G2LIajaK9wg/JpZjipIz5BFh5B+jwBF4+qs1 Wmir8yzPzl8s8e+pztvpxiknAodImd71S6Kv1EJK8N4ObQMl0FhSOSNhIjjEGhEg71LB PBL7G35mhw/Q7L9hA+FGZVGSVa1mDHrHwOxHk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=pElMuolZDVA4mI2kitFeYmXm3jQqyzK2fVv22XV5lC5uhxcd9mGMXXw9rdkgU94FWS zJUoelOSHZJ3aSLZE/2rKESE/XldG9xyA/qy/v3wRBOUQ0HrcoVg+4WOZVQ8MMcoVHue QqOIH/gkeLR61hOrIXAnoogEdArOoI/tzzm4Y=
Received: by 10.216.221.30 with SMTP id q30mr174673wep.84.1304450003070; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.157.75 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=PXwerrefOVhf_6vuFm0wwm25N3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=CBNi1NqNEjRE+Ed8MbP00h_QpXA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC051BA.5020501@gmail.com> <BANLkTi=PXwerrefOVhf_6vuFm0wwm25N3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:13:03 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTim866KQibQNn=jUPhxwH5ohEMcK=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 19:13:25 -0000

and... is a DSD style syntax for resources and separation of concerns
worth it to break compatibility with existing LLIDL implementations?

-cheers
-meadhbh
--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> wrote:
> right. but that was before we decided as a group to rewrite the
> charter and intro doc.
>
> i guess my question to you would be, are you interested in keeping
> LLSD as part of VWRAP?
> --
> meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
> @OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 05/03/2011 07:25 AM, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
>>>
>>> so... when you write your VWRAP implementation, are you going to use
>>> LLSD or DSD. why? why not?
>>>
>>
>> Already implemented LLSD last year and deployed. Wrote Snowglobe.Scalar in
>> C# that implents LLSD read/write from buffers/streams and native C# usage in
>> familar format as used in the Snowglobe/Snowstorm C++ source. The source is
>> in Icesphere. Also already started to move Icesphere and my contributions
>> for Snowglobe/Snowstorm to github (where we can fork together). Others can
>> find VWRAP, LLSD, and the HTTP server in Snowglobe/Snowstorm with what I
>> started as combined queries (what SPDY doesn't do) between frames.
>>
>> I wrote my experience with pro/cons on this list that seemed unanswered.
>> Have you looked at the LLIDL in my documentation and notice how the combined
>> queries worked?
>>
>> Noticed your last message here:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap/current/msg00775.html
>>
>> Further straw-man without implementation, I can't give you any yes or no
>> answer on that. There's no specific IETF rule, yet demonstrated flow seems
>> what other WGs expect.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
>> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> vwrap mailing list
>> vwrap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>>
>