Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd

Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com> Tue, 03 May 2011 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285ACE06F9 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXW8GnbEQci7 for <vwrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F2DE066E for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so311708wwa.13 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=csjE4ndQM6zFp8XtBamNeyW/3gKDKyD9suWqUcmSnQY=; b=D5scHdc7hqDwCV8WbdJzNsVU1taheDCb93A8EcMdjAjtkJwzIh10tE6n7nb4GEg7gn 77CupkxTkrPx5X3wYg0bGnYYdrMetw4GNp1wyuqZxylV3XVRG3eh/Cm99dr4SoLr3K5I 4+j8dzub8neGLrixfKGjfX7A6pOGW3UACzmo4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=KdHdQ4/jty9iYQo42vg2dd7D1Ngz5btNL6R9eEATI3Ak3ffS9kI37d8fz8g+JUJdA9 Pjh/Rna2WYVX6VhfQCeiRTfHZYgqyt6r6Wv7KH/n49hBDBCCmXrXlE9tf32Vu/nK/Y82 TsXo9KSk/1qOa0NaXtaTMoKCj28q7RheNuLyw=
Received: by 10.216.93.130 with SMTP id l2mr3951884wef.114.1304449921130; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.157.75 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DC051BA.5020501@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTi=CBNi1NqNEjRE+Ed8MbP00h_QpXA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC051BA.5020501@gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:11:41 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=PXwerrefOVhf_6vuFm0wwm25N3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: vwrap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vwrap] about abstract type systems... llsd and dsd
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 19:12:03 -0000

right. but that was before we decided as a group to rewrite the
charter and intro doc.

i guess my question to you would be, are you interested in keeping
LLSD as part of VWRAP?
--
meadhbh hamrick * it's pronounced "maeve"
@OhMeadhbh * http://meadhbh.org/ * OhMeadhbh@gmail.com



On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 07:25 AM, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
>>
>> so... when you write your VWRAP implementation, are you going to use
>> LLSD or DSD. why? why not?
>>
>
> Already implemented LLSD last year and deployed. Wrote Snowglobe.Scalar in
> C# that implents LLSD read/write from buffers/streams and native C# usage in
> familar format as used in the Snowglobe/Snowstorm C++ source. The source is
> in Icesphere. Also already started to move Icesphere and my contributions
> for Snowglobe/Snowstorm to github (where we can fork together). Others can
> find VWRAP, LLSD, and the HTTP server in Snowglobe/Snowstorm with what I
> started as combined queries (what SPDY doesn't do) between frames.
>
> I wrote my experience with pro/cons on this list that seemed unanswered.
> Have you looked at the LLIDL in my documentation and notice how the combined
> queries worked?
>
> Noticed your last message here:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap/current/msg00775.html
>
> Further straw-man without implementation, I can't give you any yes or no
> answer on that. There's no specific IETF rule, yet demonstrated flow seems
> what other WGs expect.
>
>
> --
> --- https://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
> Web Development, Software Engineering, Virtual Reality, Consultant
>
> _______________________________________________
> vwrap mailing list
> vwrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap
>