IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02

jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jconlin@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D2F12EC60 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iKsKnSjQyFAx for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 018C312025C for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g2so2774026pge.3 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=AfwQBOKwd1226otuexZMimCVNB+s5Vl5S5/byiH6lRs=; b=F5wLvudKsM9a4zSgG5ZGZLzh9pAJtTKmf3y0L3jBEIWk0wcuol3wjoYZ6HNRZUX3Th QjomzWjjHUQftHrmYITgTGCGjYA3OnoTVvdervc0uo/zppU3xiiIpFxfU7zT2aA7Qf2r GP90xEXXtk+0Maf7l9E0RFHtDJre5bIAx91s4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=AfwQBOKwd1226otuexZMimCVNB+s5Vl5S5/byiH6lRs=; b=aCdf2LW52iB+o0qza/gpGykEyfJeQDQ3YirNaPwXu9sm1od2iGXP2o0lMnlcriBQxp 9p3fusIwpxCbaN4RauSPYIL6pCXNr9pUMYYpokYDKXvxXXOjCUhQ2fYbbMLsfwCLNh6/ 6yadXAXmhN2Meo4cgmFws71nLfnju6DddUOcr0rKYoepQMAeeRgeDxYdUontqyhGnGc7 CqEP8S6YyFX5Khq1dFOjAqulXeI1xR89cDeZdlik5Ule8SmrKwwv4OEvBdB2FLNbFw1n nrVxayZR9V9bm+Utw8BuH0Zgiws3iQzNJLvHN16+/nEzpC1Z3LvJJBhUS/UAfFmTQpOE T1rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/67SuHZGLj/tD6FcXv3KkVWTFXKjKmAVNJeB5o76TK+vdMsgA9u ftiCuibM14YBXU6wpBhOHA==
X-Received: by 10.98.62.141 with SMTP id y13mr20273916pfj.93.1492552416801; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620:101:80fc:224:64f9:24bd:b39a:c201? ([2620:101:80fc:224:64f9:24bd:b39a:c201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p68sm344118pfp.104.2017.04.18.14.53.34 for <webpush@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: webpush@ietf.org
References: <CABF6JR3W3W3Pgs5oqQ3VuD1RMMu_-+7ftUoRJNmJq+ayF24aQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <ace459b3-79f7-b12a-eb5a-d4af06c00cbd@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:53:33 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:54.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/54.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABF6JR3W3W3Pgs5oqQ3VuD1RMMu_-+7ftUoRJNmJq+ayF24aQA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2967CD2746165BCF1A5CF0C4"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/AbHKKiylhdcmMm1FKsvMSf3YTAA>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-02
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:53:40 -0000

I'm fine with the proposed changes, and have worked them into my support
libraries.

On 4/18/17 1:43 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Just getting caught up on doc status by reading the email archive and
> I see that both outstanding WG docs were in WGLC two months ago,
> however draft-ietf-webpush-vapid never got any feedback, positive or
> negative. If anything was sent direct to the chairs before I was
> added, I am not able to see that. Please reply back to the list with
> any feedback you have. I'll leave this open for 1 week.
> Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webpush mailing list
> Webpush@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email