IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] Certificate Pinning via HSTS (.txt version)

Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <palmer@google.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A5621F8B21 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7I2Ly2cOWjo for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFCD21F8B1E for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.12]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8E0lJD4008136 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1315961239; bh=gw1Fei6UEEOJX63iAz0LeClXeuA=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xsPzR4C+bqZWkq+/7xVokvozGaR6Rq64Aht8Ao9jX8l2aMHnXcUCjPr6ACxLSDNXt jO9kSBmN5BtpVql/Efrbw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=PkxsDjOSUyYjBrD68km3uO+jKxUuclsA+gc1EjoCdoEbW4NnVsK2yOIpePpMbzKeF t3U3OkMMKI2qEM3SjPIuA==
Received: from wyh11 (wyh11.prod.google.com [10.241.226.203]) by hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8E0l0iS012234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:18 -0700
Received: by wyh11 with SMTP id 11so1180809wyh.36 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ysfWDmaQTlMg+JUC25vEntKgq76IztGsYEw11kyFInc=; b=NLemubQPkHc54DnY2bRPjNdcJgmN6qjmqfmdLWhfP8wL7rhH70DPV/B3D3fYTEzLlC u0eGyYLBCmw3H8WGM3vg==
Received: by 10.216.220.144 with SMTP id o16mr849407wep.49.1315961238013; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.220.144 with SMTP id o16mr849403wep.49.1315961237837; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.61.16 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110913153237.0851f630@resistor.net>
References: <4E6E9B77.1020802@KingsMountain.com> <4E6F9DC6.2080006@stpeter.im> <FA8A58ED-DD2B-446B-9F01-9D1D25140569@checkpoint.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110913153237.0851f630@resistor.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:47:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOuvq20NqsFaBNyLWsh8hNuHAvG0myWPtjrbxuHuiXymVS1cJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Subject: Re: [websec] Certificate Pinning via HSTS (.txt version)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:45:18 -0000

Hi all,

Unfortunately I didn't finish the new, XMLified rev of the document
today — you raised too many difficult questions. :) It's coming along
though. I might be able to get it to the list tomorrow, but I might
end up dedicating tomorrow to a different (but related) code-writing
effort, hence wouldn't get back to this until Thursday. But, it any
case, Real Soon Now.

Thanks again for all your comments and questions! It's been very helpful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email