IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] New Unified DNR/RIR Internet-Drafts

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Thu, 06 September 2012 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3622921F8552 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiUo3StbqNfs for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0EA21F84DD for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 85-7-200.lacnic.net.uy (unknown [200.7.85.90]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22338308436; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:33:00 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1119DA16-6823-4649-AB25-77523F696381"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbmoT4qZryZc2bPd-sX_Z_fF2qiGvherc_=5fC3Ycm_MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:32:54 +0100
Message-Id: <CCD56766-D3E7-45F0-BC27-15E84723202C@lacnic.net>
References: <JEMIYWSKRENYPZKOUSHQXVTVSLQF.xiejiagui@cnnic.cn> <CAL0qLwbiJt3CVZUfCZJ9YXPw_FUj2fQz=j=g51oVcR-pYtNw0w@mail.gmail.com> <007101cd8b50$a25f1fc0$e71d5f40$@cn> <CAL0qLwb1uT7g_Yzc9ZC6RX3Rg=vyxFvTU1M=BvK3qDv2By96Mg@mail.gmail.com> <008501cd8c07$2e909760$8bb1c620$@cn> <CAL0qLwbmoT4qZryZc2bPd-sX_Z_fF2qiGvherc_=5fC3Ycm_MA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: weirds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [weirds] New Unified DNR/RIR Internet-Drafts
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:33:12 -0000

	Seems reasonable to me.

Regards.
as

On 6 Sep 2012, at 22:39, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> However, you are correct about the milestones; the charter text is
> focused on providing a single solution, while the milestones show
> clear division.  This should have been caught sooner, and I apologize
> if it has led to some confusion about our direction.  I think given
> the goal of unifying work as much as practical, we should petition to
> change the milestones accordingly to focus on producing the common
> stuff first and the divergent stuff later.  Assuming the base proposed
> set of documents, something like this could work:
> 
> Feb 2013 draft-designteam-weirds-using-http to the IESG
> Apr 2013 draft-hollenbeck-weirds-rdap-sec to the IESG
> Jun 2013 draft-hollenbeck-weirds-unified-rdap-query to the IESG
> Sep 2013 draft-newton-weirds-unified-json-response to the IESG
> Dec 2013 extension drafts (if needed) to the IESG
> 
> Does anyone think those are unreasonable?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email