IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Internationalization Issues

"Ning Kong" <nkong@cnnic.cn> Mon, 05 November 2012 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <nkong@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27CE21F8618 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:13:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.068, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3pU5V14p9PiB for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C43D21F860D for <weirds@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:13:15 -0800 (PST)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: nkong@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO naptrthink) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:13:01 +0800
From: Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn>
To: 'Edward Lewis' <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, weirds@ietf.org
References: <20121102152851.92298.qmail@joyce.lan> <a06240803ccb998a827ef@[10.33.202.61]> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211021150150.92999@joyce.lan> <a06240800ccbc7fd536aa@[192.168.128.133]>
In-Reply-To: <a06240800ccbc7fd536aa@[192.168.128.133]>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:12:55 +0800
Message-ID: <005701cdbb24$fc980390$f5c80ab0$@cnnic.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMDQoYS8e1dbeQo35WYDx9+5TSgswKW1XFWAk2qcBYAoZKsuJVDkheg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Subject: Re: [weirds] Internationalization Issues
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:13:22 -0000

Hi Edward,

> When a thread begins to spin it's wheels, it's good to go back to the
> originating question.
Thanks, Edward.

> Ning's original question was whether section 12 of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-00 is sufficient
or
> should the text in section 7 of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-00 be brought back
and
> augmented.
The second link should be
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheng-weirds-icann-rws-dnrd-01

> The text really ought to discourage any translation or other manipulation
> within elements of the protocol.  And whether negotiation for language is
a
> good idea or to be discouraged.
I'm also curious whether negotiation for character code is a good idea or to
be discouraged. This requirement was raised by Kentaro Mori [1].

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/current/msg01769.html

Cheers,
Ning

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email