IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 14 March 2013 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5AE21F8E7D for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.775
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.775 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.775, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKgvSQJOcDWQ for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C3721F8E77 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.30.21.201] (unknown [72.246.0.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1287022E257; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:04:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <043401ce195a$0ca69d80$25f3d880$@packetizer.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:04:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A3C6B4A-E50F-4501-848C-D71F3E7671E7@mnot.net>
References: <043401ce195a$0ca69d80$25f3d880$@packetizer.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: IANA <iana@iana.org>, wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:23 -0000

Hi Paul,

Just a suggestion - it might be worth noting in 'related information' that the well-known URI can take a query parameter, with a reference to section 4.1. 

Regardless, request approved.

Cheers,


On 04/03/2013, at 11:29 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:

> Experts,
>  
> Could you please review the WebFinger draft that proposes the introduction of a new well-known URI?
>  
> The text can be found here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger
>  
> Your comments would be appreciated.
>  
> Paul
>  
> _______________________________________________
> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email