IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Related Active Documents

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551561B2CDC for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YaQHGKKcBl6A for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BE11B2CD3 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-173-57-89-168.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.57.89.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s6BJq0X4026412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:52:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-173-57-89-168.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [173.57.89.168] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <53C04060.10600@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:52:00 -0500
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Related Active Documents
References: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/O-dFGR6jCeMYjFT32hRPE3w-fyU
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:52:03 -0000

To make sure, you're talking about what you see at

tools.ietf.org/wg/radext
not
datatracker.ietf.org/wg/radext

correct?

On 7/11/14, 10:08 AM, Stefan Winter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on the radext status pages, I see amonst others the following drafts as
> "related active":
>
> draft-congdon-radext-ieee802-03			2005-02-18
> draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-client-mib-03 	2005-02-18
> draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-server-mib-03 	2005-02-18
> draft-salowey-radext-delegated-prefix-01 	2005-10-24
>
> All of which expired some 9 years ago, and are not in a replaced-by
> relationship.
>
> Does anyone know what exactly makes a draft "active" in the status page
> context? And can/should I make them go away?
>
> (Funny enough, the congdon one *may* be the great-grandfather of a
> current I-D, and should be a replaced-by maybe. But I am too young to
> remember the roots of the IEEE802 draft :-) )
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan Winter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email