Re: Related Active Documents
"Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 15:51 UTC
Return-Path: <wdec@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6BE1A0A8A for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svKV0m4cNlPu for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC1B1A0659 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1383; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405093914; x=1406303514; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Djd7K+BV3K9is2mPn24AOBD/wC66GbE/1rkTBQq0eqU=; b=Xp65zwAl22xRpcTvQDP6NSsIe3B62GW7I3XGa0SWOIBzouQRz8fy/iO4 F2iP5ehws4/nsqKxok9z6NI94V1bURwc6vpVp63aQgXAswz93eBhPrAM+ il0/g6GDs2Qj51u3zvqHxmhm68upzpwTM5uWT63hVFQzjL3UsDFPdC2gi w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFALQHwFOtJV2S/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SWsB7h0IBgQsWdYQEAQEEDGYXAgEIRjIlAgQBEhaILA3GPxeNOoFcOoRDBZsFlByDRIIw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,644,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="60118181"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2014 15:51:53 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6BFpfB0020256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:51:41 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.10]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:51:41 -0500
From: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Related Active Documents
Thread-Topic: Related Active Documents
Thread-Index: AQHPnRoDvHlzSQQX7UiEVz0iMwdysZubeyOA
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:51:41 +0000
Message-ID: <CFE5D3C2.FB9C3%wdec@cisco.com>
References: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509
x-originating-ip: [10.61.107.141]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <2901FED646B67C4B9BD4C18929771AC1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/blrbI_kCOwdxMieyGb_zp-LZVSU
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:51:46 -0000
Draft-alowey is actually rfc4818Š :-) So that one at least should be removed. Cheers, Wojciech. On 11/07/2014 17:08, "Stefan Winter" <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote: >Hi, > >on the radext status pages, I see amonst others the following drafts as >"related active": > >draft-congdon-radext-ieee802-03 2005-02-18 >draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-client-mib-03 2005-02-18 >draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-server-mib-03 2005-02-18 >draft-salowey-radext-delegated-prefix-01 2005-10-24 > >All of which expired some 9 years ago, and are not in a replaced-by >relationship. > >Does anyone know what exactly makes a draft "active" in the status page >context? And can/should I make them go away? > >(Funny enough, the congdon one *may* be the great-grandfather of a >current I-D, and should be a replaced-by maybe. But I am too young to >remember the roots of the IEEE802 draft :-) ) > >Greetings, > >Stefan Winter > >-- >Stefan WINTER >Ingenieur de Recherche >Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et >de la Recherche >6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi >L-1359 Luxembourg > >Tel: +352 424409 1 >Fax: +352 422473 > >PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the >recipient's key is known to me > >http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 >
- Re: Related Active Documents Robert Sparks
- Related Active Documents Stefan Winter
- Re: Related Active Documents Benoit Claise
- Re: Related Active Documents Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: Related Active Documents Stefan Winter