IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Related Active Documents

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BAD1A0652 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KsAV4NaON0V for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66DDC1A036D for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 08:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3391; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405093640; x=1406303240; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=iow+98q08Nhl3i15EOsOITtzSp58lbgPy+v8hEZt020=; b=HdRv79zeON80T/Y1aVuaIEIaurYO9LkZe5pe1ggv2Armj5pEclVYyXKw 5DOBpLkV0Ce4/HeAbpBD3quKBIzTZV33Y7ViIX+GrJH1Ci/V525UpsGk1 VPzDTpiKAxjr02h3TnU6JE2YX6B4/qRqbLSK2mOsQ4DLWCOpjdr9s945n 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQHANIFwFOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABZg2CwBI9vgWGHQgGBIXWEBAEBBHIXCwQdJQ8CRgYBDAgBAYg+DcY+F49QhEMBBJsFgUqFSY0Jg0Y7
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,644,1400025600"; d="scan'208,217";a="108176266"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2014 15:47:18 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6BFl83Q021527; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:47:08 GMT
Message-ID: <53C006FC.10006@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:47:08 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Related Active Documents
References: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
In-Reply-To: <53BFFDE7.5020600@restena.lu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020506040207010102010105"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/jQLm4Yba-UC7qUFyLXN8wHeMHAw
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:47:12 -0000

Hi Stefan,
> Hi,
>
> on the radext status pages, I see amonst others the following drafts as
> "related active":
>
> draft-congdon-radext-ieee802-03			2005-02-18
Isn't draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-12 ?
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext/>
> draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-client-mib-03 	2005-02-18
RFC 4672 <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4672/>
/(was draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib)/
> draft-decnodder-radext-dynauth-server-mib-03 	2005-02-18
RFC 4673 <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4673/>
/(was draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib)


Regards, Benoit
/
> draft-salowey-radext-delegated-prefix-01 	2005-10-24
>
> All of which expired some 9 years ago, and are not in a replaced-by
> relationship.
>
> Does anyone know what exactly makes a draft "active" in the status page
> context? And can/should I make them go away?
>
> (Funny enough, the congdon one *may* be the great-grandfather of a
> current I-D, and should be a replaced-by maybe. But I am too young to
> remember the roots of the IEEE802 draft :-) )
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan Winter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email