Re: Easier access to diffs, etc.
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 14 March 2012 03:19 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A26021E8067 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs6wmIY7jWWi for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D90621E805F for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [201.204.76.162]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F6031B407FB; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:19:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Easier access to diffs, etc.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F5FCCE2.4020902@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:19:52 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36AB67E4-55A8-4E6A-B1B2-147B047F700C@kumari.net>
References: <25477_1331633317_q2DA8Z8h025995_4F5F1CA0.1010602@cisco.com> <1331658531.3570.122.camel@destiny.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <4F5F82C7.40401@alum.mit.edu> <310097CF-365A-40A4-9F89-2F48FC253FEF@kumari.net> <4F5FCCE2.4020902@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:19:55 -0000
On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Popping back in the thread several messages: > > I agree that the announcement / revised-id messages should point to better places. > > Warren's redirect is interesting. I've seen a suggestion that stopped just short of asking that > we configure www.ietf.org to do exactly that kind of redirect on /id/<blah>. That would > produce unexpected results. > > One thing to keep in mind - What if you really are looking for the .txt version of the document > (to feed into some other tool for instance). What link do you use? > > Warren - Your plugin probably does the right thing, but if you haven't tested it already you might want > to check - if you have the default you point to below set to datatracker.ietf.org, does the right thing > happen when you click the "plain text" link in the first block of a datatracker's main view for a document? Yes, but only if I define "the right thing" to be to redirect you back to the datatracker interface -- I guess I could claim that this is the right thing to do because it provides entertainment, especially if you are (like me) easily entertained… I will get around to spinning a new version soon that deals with this. I originally wrote this for personal use only, and so it is not particularity polished… W > > RjS > > > On 3/13/12 3:10 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: >> >>> On a related note, I've been wishing that the I-D Action announcement messages provided more convenient access to info about the draft. >>> A link to the diff with the previous version would be nice, >>> as would a link to the html version of the document in the tools area (which in turn has links to all sorts of renditions of the doc.) >>> >>> I find that the link that is currently provided is rarely the one I want, so I'm always having to copy the name, and then search for the form I want. Its easier to just click. :-) >>> >> It you use Chrome, I have written an extension that does jus this… >> It is linked to from the Tools page (http://tools.ietf.org/), or a direct link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/aiccdpabeagpjcebilebhlifplfkinao >> >> This simply watches for a URL of the form http://www.ietf.org/id/foo-04.txt and replaces it with http://tools.ietf/org/html/foo (or, if you change the default in the options page, datatracker.ietf.org). >> >> >> W >> >> >> >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >>> >>> On 3/13/12 1:08 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 11:08 +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm wondering how to do, with the IETF tools, a diff between a WG >>>>> document "RFC bis" and the "RFC" in the following example: >>>>> >>>>> 1. RFC 5101 was published >>>>> 2. And individual draft was published to update it >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-02 >>>>> 3. >>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-01 was >>>>> accepted as a WG document >>>>> >>>>> The tools >>>>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-01) >>>>> allows the diffs between the 2. and 3.. And I would like the automatic >>>>> diff between 1. and .3 >>>>> >>>>> Any other ways than loading the different versions in >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/? >>>> As you probably know, the tools page for an internet-draft, like >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-01 >>>> includes links for jumping from one version to the next, and for showing >>>> the differences between the version you're viewing and the previous >>>> version. When one document succeeds another, such as a WG document >>>> replacing an individual one or, in this case, the individual document >>>> being the start of a revision of RFC5101, those links inlcude the >>>> ability to jump from one document to the next, and to compare the first >>>> version of one document with the last version of the document before it. >>>> >>>> So, if you go to the page for draft-claise-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-00 >>>> and click the "Diff1" link, you'll see differences in that document >>>> since RFC5101. >>>> >>>> As far as I know, there is no "friendly" way to click on something and >>>> see differences between two documents that are not immediately adjacent >>>> versions. However, you can fairly easily edit the URL to get what you >>>> want. Simply bring up the diff page for the later document, and add >>>> "&url1=XXX" to the end of the URL, where XXX is the document you want to >>>> compare against. Acceptable forms include draft-foo-bar-00 and rfcXXXX. >>>> >>>> So, to see the differences between the most recent rfc5101bis and the >>>> original rfc5101, try this: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-rfc5101bis-01.txt&url1=rfc5101 >>>> >>>> -- Jeff >>>> >>>> >> -- >> Don't be impressed with unintelligible stuff said condescendingly. >> -- Radia Perlman. >> >> >> >> >> > -- Don't be impressed with unintelligible stuff said condescendingly. -- Radia Perlman.
- Diff2 from RFC -> individual RFCbis document -> W… Benoit Claise
- Re: Diff2 from RFC -> individual RFCbis document … Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Easier access to diffs, etc. Paul Kyzivat
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Warren Kumari
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Paul Kyzivat
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jari Arkko
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Pete Resnick
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jari Arkko
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Pete Resnick
- RE: Easier access to diffs, etc. Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Robert Sparks
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jari Arkko
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Pete Resnick
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jari Arkko
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Robert Sparks
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Robert Sparks
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Jari Arkko
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Martin Thomson
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Adam Roach
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Warren Kumari
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Martin Thomson
- Re: Easier access to diffs, etc. Dean Willis