Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists and github repos
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Sun, 07 June 2026 22:47 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: wgchairs@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C328EFCFE8A2; Sun, 7 Jun 2026 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1780872451; bh=CfNDJxJ1fwm0xLIaSVpA6ti1ewkdn74FrD5w7jiQR8M=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=VjePEEg2xYBD39ioKUqMWIvZxDlwUDkxYXlUi0CBMB+NI3EMNts8/TnRhhDQMNy0Y Fw+gon156FZsW03WOr+fuu4n7smnLKWnjOsOG9AiBGhR4fw1yvnm0xVUYbP/mhcGB5 M14taMbY0YkB6ShXVG5KSl+09iSI3Ukf3XALC0kE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEGwBgLEFQNy; Sun, 7 Jun 2026 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A8EFCFE89A; Sun, 7 Jun 2026 15:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-188-202-8.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.188.202.8]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75CC31E257; Sun, 7 Jun 2026 18:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists and github repos
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D0350D11-F7B7-4FEB-B0F4-1095B0115D88@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 18:47:12 -0400
Message-Id: <3DD72EBF-AAF3-43A5-A3F7-F8A21AE6C3D5@pfrc.org>
References: <D0350D11-F7B7-4FEB-B0F4-1095B0115D88@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (23E261)
Message-ID-Hash: AXXNAQGDMNTFXZ4H7TAM7RADYJHAHN6Q
X-Message-ID-Hash: AXXNAQGDMNTFXZ4H7TAM7RADYJHAHN6Q
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-wgchairs.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Rohan Mahy <rohan.mahy@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Chairs WG <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/tTxya2XGDvRbxUhc-Ft_5m4wIDU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:wgchairs-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wgchairs-leave@ietf.org>
Jay, > On Jun 7, 2026, at 18:27, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote: > > > See the discussion on RSWG that Mark mentioned. There are strong arguments being that the first part "This contribution was originally generated by" is none of our business so long as the second part "I personally reviewed every word." is adhered to. When a human generates the content, they know what their IPR inputs are. When a general purpose AI is a participant, that’s not necessarily true. Minimally, one would think that IPR declarations are different when this is the case. Jeff
- Participation using AI in WG mailing lists and gi… Rohan Mahy
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mike Ounsworth
- RE: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Rohan Mahy
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Jeffrey Haas
- RE: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Cheng Li
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Jay Daley
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Pieter Kasselman
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Tim Bray
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Rohan Mahy
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Marc Blanchet
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Rohan Mahy
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Michael Richardson
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mike Ounsworth
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Martin Thomson
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Tim Hollebeek
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Tim Bray
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Tim Hollebeek
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mike Ounsworth
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Marc Blanchet
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Salz, Rich
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Ignacio De Castro Arribas
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Mike Ounsworth
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Tim Hollebeek
- Re: Participation using AI in WG mailing lists an… Jeffrey Haas