IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Wish] WG adoption of draft-murillo-whep

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Thu, 04 January 2024 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F17C14F604 for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lkidmPY1K5vh for <wish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E7AC14F5FB for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-554fe147ddeso690348a12.3 for <wish@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704381418; x=1704986218; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=r2GJErPgEoexQBU69SAZxQ1ZEZQdsm/V69NZu61dTJU=; b=GP+45g3PtMoaHJu3si7S+VSQ7vSkCqCcxAm60mSELOM6A0veSrMYLMjBIAVotFd25y y4mbZIt25DfUStXPNd4m4PN9RHtWxlc/vQMTUlAxwAAzO4zB2YxOeFfR7oux49kKBHiA rC7uI5TtA7dJVTevzauCZKw14J3ydjRHkmYkNO7iCT2vO4nqVNO50WBGwY7i0EBBt1S7 5wPl3y0iTu8O1sQERwfOKy//IEF6+l4+pqcy0pRdpwf5VP76kiK0zj+Nyv6dEyUx0uXq tspxvesnfX5PdZKKQkPEC9NmhkemiK8jSzpKFECGQzpPyyPiTxIQGSOfwoQsSJaOaOn+ zjTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704381418; x=1704986218; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=r2GJErPgEoexQBU69SAZxQ1ZEZQdsm/V69NZu61dTJU=; b=w/9j9tMzQvt4PNM9Xl+WMZDS1wtrmbL0FzHiZ5m7r11zLqVVI0TctKqMwV7Sw5s1ye qvE/JS/0eGyDh2FGJDdvqJtocuMzzPfyaQLQz2FSvJG88ZgZzt9DR8seNmTQg9oTzYi7 POx8LfDu5Qs8h7Vyc0eZ8+SbW6iu1aRoMJdVX7dBZo4MJLkxVFl1ZKp+Jrg8DLRr4oCj ddczQiCe232ZjuT3KQngoa17uT4Jli/CDKeh1C1odwtDihpSvAjZkch9BiMDqMm4eQOW bROhSNYkj4Y65187E9wgEKuKq7aSKyYclvXarA6DNoFtrV4i+vfsodwmx4nm7fxdIunQ 0oEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyc6FtlcQxzRNNM7cDK8t2zP9RMEbXiazIzWYGbAebQLq5msOEI XMyucMAnfePdv8eyw4qad8Nv5tjY3X8hHcGmfOg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUywuqmkNfyApB9YEDr4425J3BaCt5Y+49xgWBSe4pgZ/asUAtR3epLfRDNycpDKGs6sTxIamrKqoMQspMab8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2038:b0:553:a3ec:3be1 with SMTP id ay24-20020a056402203800b00553a3ec3be1mr236829edb.163.1704381418128; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 07:16:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <33B28B00-99D6-4DFC-9AF7-B9F7BF8CDE0F@sn3rd.com> <4dfea0b1-fce0-c99e-74dd-5f04471b1ddf@nostrum.com> <CAOW+2duzprAJe_Q8L-XApGsyz+qmj+sKh+VbJd0968Xev8UZiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2duzprAJe_Q8L-XApGsyz+qmj+sKh+VbJd0968Xev8UZiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 16:16:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ag07aeEnxJkAbrbKA2jqDeGeG2f8M8G=PSFkL9DkD4V9ab0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, WISH List <wish@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd547c060e2038e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/R7r3rSfbp4JwMj9nvDdidE5GUI8>
Subject: Re: [Wish] WG adoption of draft-murillo-whep
X-BeenThere: wish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: WebRTC Ingest Signaling over HTTPS <wish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wish/>
List-Post: <mailto:wish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>, <mailto:wish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 15:17:04 -0000

It is still to be proven that MoQ is able to provide ultra low latency
streaming (<100ms) where WebRTC is a solid technology in that space.

Also, I don't think that we should prevent having a wide range of
distribution protocols available.

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 3:49 PM Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The IETF is currently working on multiple distribution protocols.  Based
> on the work done in MoQ (including the requirements document), I am
> concerned that WHEP only addresses a subset of the low-latency streaming
> use cases addressed in MoQ.
>
> For example, I've been told by major low-latency streamers that WHEP is
> not acceptable for streaming of sports or live performance due to lack of
> support for DRM, something MoQ supports via transport of CMAF.
>
> Is there something that WHEP can do that MoQ can't?  If not, why bother
> creating yet another distribution protocol?
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:45 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure. Based on some of the use cases explained earlier (most notably in
>> the blog article at
>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/webrtc-whip-whep-cloudflare-stream), this
>> seems like a good interface to have standardized, and the WHEP draft
>> seems a perfectly fine basis to adopt for performing that standardization.
>>
>> /a
>>
>> On 12/19/23 19:25, Sean Turner wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Now that the WISH WG has been recharter [0], it is time to start the
>> formal WG adoption call for draft-murillo-whep.  Please state whether you
>> support adoption of draft-murillo-whep as a WG item by posting a message to
>> the WISH list by 11 January 2024 @ 2359 UTC. Please include any additional
>> information that is helpful in understanding your position.
>> >
>> > Note that as it is the holiday. I will send multiple reminders that
>> this WG adoption call on-going.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > spt
>> >
>> > [0]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wish/O3KQvSvj_wXAPB18OfqOYdIk_zQ/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wish mailing list
>> Wish@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish
>>
> --
> Wish mailing list
> Wish@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email