Re: centroid propagation

Simon Spero <> Tue, 26 October 1993 05:25 UTC

Received: from by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20052; 26 Oct 93 1:25 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20044; 26 Oct 93 1:25 EDT
Received: from by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08485; 26 Oct 93 1:25 EDT
Received: by (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA01647; Mon, 25 Oct 93 22:02:22 PDT
Received: from by (4.1/UCD2.05) id AA01332; Mon, 25 Oct 93 21:55:14 PDT
Received: from by (SMI4.1/FvK 1.02) id AA04590; Tue, 26 Oct 93 00:56:16 EDT
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1993 00:55:18 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Simon Spero <>
To: Mark Prior <>
Subject: Re: centroid propagation
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: Your message <> of Tue, 26 Oct 1993 08:56:19 +0930
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

[All or nothing]

The latest version, which Chris should be getting out in a few hours, has some
changes to this. The changes bascially add weighting to the terms in a
gogether with a special entry which signifies that other values may be valid
this term, but which the polled server is not prepared to provide.