Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9276D1278CF for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:36:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qD5XT-VDKsi4 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97C631277DE for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.10.104] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 543CA29619; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:36:08 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <af4ecb0e-d34b-ef89-ed1a-3d07cc4a3bf1@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:36:07 -0500
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2AB128E4-E3E4-41EB-BEAD-CC8683630065@bangj.com>
References: <846D0EFD-ADFE-427B-A8C7-5A71FEB7CA7B@bangj.com> <e642d5b7-17a8-0b83-166f-2c55c916d8c8@gmx.de> <af4ecb0e-d34b-ef89-ed1a-3d07cc4a3bf1@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/-g9fg2L_aveIKaSUBgdzJsGqSg8>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:36:13 -0000

> On Mar 7, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> On 07.03.2019 05:27, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 07.03.2019 03:45, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>>> When using markdown-rfc2629 to generate XML and rfc2629.xslt and friends to create a standalone XML file, I notice that my Appendix A Section gets a header of just A.
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile, the TXT and HTML versions generated by XML2RFC get a header of Appendix A.
>>> 
>>> You can see it here online:
>>> 
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pusateri-dnssd-update-proxy-01.xml (Scroll to the end)
>>> 
>>> and after grabbing the latest versions from greenbytes.de, the same thing happens locally.
>>> 
>>> Is this intentional or just an oversight?
>>> ...
>> I believe it's an oversight. See <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.9>.
>> Working on it.
>> Best regards, Julian
> 
> ...done.

Thanks!

Just tried it. It fixed the Section Title but not the generated index.

Tom