Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question
Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Thu, 07 March 2019 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498FE13146B for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIwKPw5MuUXU for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87EEE131471 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.10.123] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88FCF29624; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:46:59 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <4babc6a4-d5f3-9666-7221-8e933e522c09@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:46:58 -0500
Cc: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74B188CF-7B27-4448-B311-B6FE2BF4B062@bangj.com>
References: <846D0EFD-ADFE-427B-A8C7-5A71FEB7CA7B@bangj.com> <e642d5b7-17a8-0b83-166f-2c55c916d8c8@gmx.de> <af4ecb0e-d34b-ef89-ed1a-3d07cc4a3bf1@gmx.de> <2AB128E4-E3E4-41EB-BEAD-CC8683630065@bangj.com> <4babc6a4-d5f3-9666-7221-8e933e522c09@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/Eid5ErxI0u5ojTp8Dqa2OBJksis>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:47:13 -0000
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 10:38 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 07.03.2019 16:36, Tom Pusateri wrote: >>> On Mar 7, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>>> On 07.03.2019 05:27, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>>> On 07.03.2019 03:45, Tom Pusateri wrote: >>>>> When using markdown-rfc2629 to generate XML and rfc2629.xslt and friends to create a standalone XML file, I notice that my Appendix A Section gets a header of just A. >>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, the TXT and HTML versions generated by XML2RFC get a header of Appendix A. >>>>> >>>>> You can see it here online: >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pusateri-dnssd-update-proxy-01.xml (Scroll to the end) >>>>> >>>>> and after grabbing the latest versions from greenbytes.de, the same thing happens locally. >>>>> >>>>> Is this intentional or just an oversight? >>>>> ... >>>> I believe it's an oversight. See <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.9>. >>>> Working on it. >>>> Best regards, Julian >>> >>> ...done. >> Thanks! >> Just tried it. It fixed the Section Title but not the generated index. > > It also doesn't change the ToC... > > I'm not sure that this should affect the index. Sorry, I meant the TOC not index. Tom
- [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Tom Pusateri
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Tom Pusateri
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Tom Pusateri
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question Julian Reschke