Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 07 March 2019 04:27 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F3D130E67 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:27:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtZl_C43UF-V for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:27:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B886130E57 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:27:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([91.61.56.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVsUW-1hYpJ70B9U-00X3Hk; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 05:27:01 +0100
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <846D0EFD-ADFE-427B-A8C7-5A71FEB7CA7B@bangj.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <e642d5b7-17a8-0b83-166f-2c55c916d8c8@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 05:27:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <846D0EFD-ADFE-427B-A8C7-5A71FEB7CA7B@bangj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:z4BE2siNnscmcPq5QVXscCPtbrhtgT4afwokehYxE8hbDWiw19q OxByucYGLJ+XCCL1jdoKGHXPZv3fI7g1BAKlNYQ6rROfc5Ytod0l/2cPw9sHBVDm6G7Dvaj XqAbWvdkTJJzglFHP7VmghOHJdKXc8RJFrK8HmoSSxliFmRcc+/oE41belsgE20/uGsE2g/ EMcvgtn2QwN7J3sbWuJcw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:EFT1De5pcl4=:EVvifVtZx7MyL13sLmX2q8 +CKqAcecQLke2mDeMnefZwo9WOg7A6aLTg4qqiPADE+z0+rp2VtX7M8l4J1og4lS2DmJsZWeQ iJkzjGqlLoZSGFNxJse6ojQT927il3xmvUUoMeIncKIwXegb/HcK3NzZsS/C3P1zwqJj4roiR Vt+d2Vh5Ok8nDrJAnU32EwmL+Dn/5xrmrLNyHhk1hUanmyfWWDm7VOC1rvpt+TuW2YnmmFJqx 9fSDQCLFiR3cfP5FfM5JCmidPO9xKiuBoApEsdk5b+uittPClLlRCiDGKZFoMpwUzMTFj3iJY Zs8dGzfcGtmbZEPkDrQxEdZ23lFGlM6njrdXX2bDOwb7ah/d8ZVYQ5sAh2deyCdXnO3VmR3SQ xJi4Xda+jTCCj91nsILlQvb1AF/Ggw/cgdE01u3UEp0RdiQdQeChOrVtJBy9Zv+649wOfRthf A/0duozdCtWkN0tGl5G6pwT6U0eLQS0hRzz/7dg1nPwP8P27jL/yDFu9XG6Ro25RblpN5xnWf eqenMAkWMZZ00OBusSIxRX7UkdqsV7m7m6oArF8IATMrhq0xCbEIWmy7Vt36cV7MkHxGripuH /lgZGgAd4I63J1eyCtalVEJGhT1hpMJQ6Cq4h+/v6ncLoFSpZGu+ztI7V6x+Duw7t3ZP58P3N N3I+NaJjQJYIU9aJ0pcl4FgRZrFBNhWwUhF6/rrFerq9tJw1DHLb/SYdpEBXaZR7TPNE2mZgb oqur82V0gR4o+NwEPfEPwsR4U8FkuFvcLz0FwYjM5TEWcCFSYFU7zewkWencnZrC4bIBDloyq plGy2WrRXy2V8+fEf6o+cTY/sAJYXYPR5fe1vJMdKOzoSCl9peEkoWETNTDeEHMFhF2q1chcK XBMjdMsB8HBzyTyWrrYaLQXiBoUkcjz6vhVQVJKQWJBz9BZ+k8adr8TLA5/vHsnVVQZth6dwf fPzlBXEOICw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/1bHtiAMtXKWPDFTXOuJRXb95SgY>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] rfc2629 xslt question
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:27:09 -0000

On 07.03.2019 03:45, Tom Pusateri wrote:
> When using markdown-rfc2629 to generate XML and rfc2629.xslt and friends to create a standalone XML file, I notice that my Appendix A Section gets a header of just A.
> 
> Meanwhile, the TXT and HTML versions generated by XML2RFC get a header of Appendix A.
> 
> You can see it here online:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pusateri-dnssd-update-proxy-01.xml (Scroll to the end)
> 
> and after grabbing the latest versions from greenbytes.de, the same thing happens locally.
> 
> Is this intentional or just an oversight?
> ...

I believe it's an oversight. See 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.9>.

Working on it.

Best regards, Julian