[xml2rfc] eref placement in references sections
fenner at research.att.com (Bill Fenner) Wed, 07 June 2006 06:40 UTC
From: "fenner at research.att.com"
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 06:40:06 +0000
Subject: [xml2rfc] eref placement in references sections
Message-ID: <200606071339.k57DdtUw032539@bright.research.att.com>
X-Date: Wed Jun 7 06:40:06 2006
I have a problem in a document that I'm currently writing. It has two normative references and no informative, so I have a single <references title="Normative References">. I added an eref, for convenience, which is an informative reference. However, because of the current xml2rfc logic, it ends up in the Normative section. My understanding of the current logic: a) If there is only one references section, the eref goes there. b) Otherwise, the eref goes in a seperate "URLs" section which is not explicitly labelled as to whether it's normative or not. I think my options with the current system are: 1. Make up an informative reference that the document doesn't need, to trigger behavior b 2. Don't use an eref. It's only to a working group charter, so there's no pressing need to use an eref, so I will probably use option 2. However, I was wondering if anyone else was running into issues like this and can we come up with a DTD change that addresses this? (e.g., allow empty <references>, allow anchor= on <references>, and allow goesInReferenceSection= [with a better name] on <eref>?) Alternately, perhaps there could be a flag (or something) to always generate the URLs section seperately instead of using the presence of only a single references tag as an implicit request? Thanks, Bill >From mark at digitalfountain.com Fri Jun 16 12:16:32 2006 From: mark at digitalfountain.com (Mark Watson) Date: Fri Jun 16 11:17:39 2006 Subject: [xml2rfc] I-D citation database: docs with multiple authors Message-ID: <277CB7DD1E4B4C4C860484C00389C9C92A30A2@EXVS01.ex.dslextreme.net> Hi, I notice that some citation entries (for example http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.ietf-rmt-fec-bb -revised.xml) include only a single author whereas the target document has several authors. Checking back, I don't think this is new (i.e. the citations for previous versions of the document were also like this). I guess this could be a problem with the program which constructs the citation XML or a problem with the way the authors have been included in the cited document itself. Any ideas ? Best regards, Mark Watson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://drakken.dbc.mtview.ca.us/pipermail/xml2rfc/attachments/20060616/9e5a6c30/attachment.htm >From mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us Sat Jun 17 13:55:15 2006 From: mrose at dbc.mtview.ca.us (Marshall Rose) Date: Sat Jun 17 02:55:48 2006 Subject: [xml2rfc] I-D citation database: docs with multiple authors In-Reply-To: <277CB7DD1E4B4C4C860484C00389C9C92A30A2@EXVS01.ex.dslextreme.net> References: <277CB7DD1E4B4C4C860484C00389C9C92A30A2@EXVS01.ex.dslextreme.net> Message-ID: <D7E44981-6D56-41D8-B431-D2D3494C7192@dbc.mtview.ca.us> > Checking back, I don?t think this is new (i.e. the citations for > previous versions of the document were also like this). > > I guess this could be a problem with the program which constructs > the citation XML or a problem with the way the authors have been > included in the cited document itself. > > Any ideas ? the file that is used to generate the xml file ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.txt lists only one author. /mtr
- [xml2rfc] eref placement in references sections Bill Fenner