Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7932D21F9F6C for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9RuyOHEJ+o8 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E04121F9E3A for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.9] (cpe-76-187-89-238.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.89.238]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r83FBucX054310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:11:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:11:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C7CAD90-B5DA-40D0-933C-93E0A409DDA3@nostrum.com>
References: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
To: XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 76.187.89.238 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:12:06 -0000

(as chair)

The chairs have seen several statements of support, and no objections. Please consider the draft adopted as an XMPP working group item.

Lance, please resubmit as a "draft-ietf-xmpp-..." draft at your convenience.

Thanks!

Ben.

On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> (as chair)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The XMPP working group has a chartered work item to define a WebSocket subprotocol for XMPP. (Please ignore the lack of an actual milestone--the chairs have been remiss on updating those. But it's in the charter text, really! )
> 
> Lance recently submitted draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-04. We've had a fair amount of discussion of previous versions on the XMPP list.
> 
> Should the XMPP work group accept draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-04 as a work group item in support of the chartered work? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is absolutely correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone.
> 
> Please send your opinions to the XMPP working group by the end of next week (31 Aug 2013.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp