IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket

Lance Stout <lancestout@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lancestout@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187D711E82FC for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSFumLh2x9e3 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF31D11E82F4 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y10so998437pdj.39 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=nSriVfIw96/fuj5SGkUaDy2HNVtN/XZuOt19vDBEcqs=; b=Gu3gGuY5yNU7OeXKoWnud2/fM7OKZQ5helILzEv/NeiuwFA+L6jonpfWzRWCB8qKUu RsNfgaNI+uEzmrK1UBTFOWTcAtj3QOVeW1QTvkpOxh2MEWViapLqmd20V6rBbRO+y1X2 oDnkWs/yKvz75gWGto0/H12bY7uKcapnBOiN9x9zxly7xjFPZy1q6a3nm6KMZzHecMbS 1LbkuecYPK/MAC7qQ1B8e4rNc47H17GdgNvhIV5vXg7xvwmwg38i9gDvMwPHqlx+6AZl IubayENvSaXYb16tOUhgqSXST69SjyATOUxfQUclYJ7UsZ1+WRfsvOcjIYcainHTxoqD 8WVQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.218.199 with SMTP id pi7mr4525783pbc.19.1377038740729; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.197] (71-84-176-17.dhcp.mdfd.or.charter.com. [71.84.176.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fl3sm6050459pad.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D1D4B5B2-E0EB-43EF-B49A-FCA99102A172"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Lance Stout <lancestout@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:45:38 -0700
Message-Id: <957D56DA-37D3-40E5-B8D1-D7AC4F8D1098@gmail.com>
References: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: XMPP <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:45:43 -0000

> Should the XMPP work group accept draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-04
> as a work group item in support of the chartered work?


I'm biased, but I second adoption.


-- Lance

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email