IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE7211E83A5 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iwcz1rrOKMFF for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89E811E80FB for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7138; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377092050; x=1378301650; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=9f143LDHyUb6SBlR26zEtzSvQFQqjcMMLkSs5MkwneA=; b=dC4B21Bmy5zih3AXpKu4HkUjMMY2eYBkroSowplN+63GvCn73XKMakOk mNoYC6EZewYncBRvFwcwOJATVPi7Ou/aW18+F+lDNlKCPjCxQHDiX2D7U S1160wiZIwKnZIdnbAQCzOt6aWzx7FCA94ImKyQTayFzay19me+sulWqr k=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4136
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFACvBFFKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABagwWBBr9agSIWdIIlAQEEeRACAQgiJAIwJQIEDgUIBogCrWeQJDEHgxt5A5AWgS6Xd4Mcgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,928,1367971200"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="249988585"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2013 13:34:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7LDY81r028076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:08 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.124]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:34:08 -0500
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket
Thread-Index: AQHOnfFsTrAxgobQMUePM9Yzyff6uJmf/igA
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:08 +0000
Message-ID: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EEAF249@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
References: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <03C5234F-7DEE-4EFD-AFDF-C2CBF53BD099@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.101.72.48]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6721E75-636A-4979-9EE9-F9AE159299EF"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call : Adoption of draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:16 -0000

On Aug 20, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> (as chair)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The XMPP working group has a chartered work item to define a WebSocket subprotocol for XMPP. (Please ignore the lack of an actual milestone--the chairs have been remiss on updating those. But it's in the charter text, really! )
> 
> Lance recently submitted draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-04. We've had a fair amount of discussion of previous versions on the XMPP list.
> 
> Should the XMPP work group accept draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-04 as a work group item in support of the chartered work? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is absolutely correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone.
> 
> Please send your opinions to the XMPP working group by the end of next week (31 Aug 2013.)
> 

Yes, the XMPP WG should accept this document.


- m&m

Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email