Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg

"Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)" <> Thu, 07 April 2016 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2FD12D628 for <>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.931
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kSSsV6IA9mgB for <>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D7E12D615 for <>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 34950CC749330; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( []) by (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u37KF9UV018318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:15:09 GMT
Received: from ( []) by (GMO) with ESMTP id u37KF848008832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:15:08 +0200
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:15:08 +0200
From: "Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)" <>
To: "EXT Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>, Shida Schubert <>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
Thread-Index: AQHRkQR3fEow1DQCT0GRf2xORyMvx59+7iqw///gcICAAAEtgIAAIcmQ
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:15:07 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADEBC274FR712WXCHMBA11z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: xrblock <>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:15:16 -0000

If I recall correctly, four people objected to the document proceeding.

Some (including myself) indicated that they would review the position if circumstances changed.

Noone indicated an automatic change of their position on xxxx occurring.

I don’t expect this to take long, but I still think this should be asked, just to ensure there is nothing else lurking.


From: EXT Romascanu, Dan (Dan) []
Sent: 07 April 2016 21:11
To: Shida Schubert; Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
Cc: xrblock
Subject: RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg


As far as I understand the process, the document is now owned by the Area Director. She may choose to consult the WG about the way forward, but this is not a mandatory step in the process at this point.



From: xrblock [] On Behalf Of Shida Schubert
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:07 PM
To: Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
Cc: xrblock
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg


Good point, I will add that to the action item && change “Herald” > “Harald” as noted.


On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) <<>> wrote:

In regard to the unblocking of the video document, given that the previous question went to the mailing list, formally I think you should take the unblocking to the mailing list, i.e. ask “Can we now proceed”. Obviously this can only happen when you can point to the formal withdrawal.


From: xrblock [] On Behalf Of EXT Shida Schubert
Sent: 07 April 2016 20:34
To: xrblock
Subject: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg


Minutes from the yesterday’s session is available below;<>

Please advice if anything should be corrected.