Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 07 April 2016 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C688212D55A for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=2KEvJABE; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=kdvNKNmi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w2QuOr704Vn8 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1297D12D10C for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A0020C75 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:03:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:03:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=e6AEN 31h6HUy+8+ihDZRUCfOTaU=; b=2KEvJABEaysuzLSubDmXerQP5QYsFs2jShcLy 92fIxv3FeMTVxkmBpdHAZlKPG/kZHgSI+NgYJ7bv9K0gRkAq++ruFkEQQMrtxckM jolQWlbEQHmpLLEvOfGTKmFh9gRL/mRP+7OZzqDWwUiIkAiRbW/XzDsuv9drHltT 9tf9DI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=e6AEN31h6HUy+8+ihDZRUCfOTaU=; b=kdvNK NmihdY2dllv8AgcLvwQ9kyNlfeFXu/wwwOEgYM5iPFay9x14L7G1NuTJY+szGOjL vxi8e8jD22e/Y9320gWUex380pEl/b2Ar7mXiF61K/JYZHaVpi1u7uURMovOvuGu j4ujPiAmDL7Hbx/AXC/6Z8qMbRfyG6y+5wzfts=
X-Sasl-enc: G22kxZiaRnLw4YAoDP5aFJTzfcYrhSJ+1ptkTqGlUpfj 1460063004
Received: from [10.24.79.70] (unknown [128.107.241.191]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B720F6801F1; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFFDD362-DC2D-4CCF-96D3-809166FD6D5B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <5706C2C7.7050401@telchemy.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:03:31 -0300
Message-Id: <1105172A-F61B-41A5-9D86-271624662A01@cooperw.in>
References: <1C28C3E5-1737-49CB-B70C-5F98225790C7@ntt-at.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADEBC201@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <C04E2D65-3EB5-4E9F-B971-E03387D59D2D@ntt-at.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751BF601@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADEBC274@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751BF64D@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <5706C2C7.7050401@telchemy.com>
To: Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/35ymeIvBT4-nlOym7-Uw-efbdPk>
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:03:29 -0000

I’m waiting until the disclosure is withdrawn, at which point I will clear my DISCUSS and approve publication.

I sent Rachel instructions for how to get the disclosure withdrawn. There is some manual process involved.

Alissa

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> wrote:
> 
> Dan
> 
> As a WG participant I would support the document proceeding after the IPR disclosure has been withdrawn.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alan Clark
> 
> On 4/7/16 4:19 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> Speaking as a contributor, I agree with your point.
>>  
>> As a WG chair and document shepherd – I will raise this issue with the AD. The control belongs to the IESG at this point – this is the way I understand the process (and I may be wrong on this). 
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Dan
>>  
>>  
>> From: Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) [mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com <mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com>] 
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:15 PM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> If I recall correctly, four people objected to the document proceeding.
>>  
>> Some (including myself) indicated that they would review the position if circumstances changed.
>>  
>> Noone indicated an automatic change of their position on xxxx occurring.
>>  
>> I don’t expect this to take long, but I still think this should be asked, just to ensure there is nothing else lurking.
>>  
>> Keith
>>  
>> From: EXT Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com <mailto:dromasca@avaya.com>] 
>> Sent: 07 April 2016 21:11
>> To: Shida Schubert; Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> Hi,
>>  
>> As far as I understand the process, the document is now owned by the Area Director. She may choose to consult the WG about the way forward, but this is not a mandatory step in the process at this point. 
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Dan
>>  
>>  
>> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Shida Schubert
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:07 PM
>> To: Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> Keith;
>>  
>> Good point, I will add that to the action item && change “Herald” > “Harald” as noted. 
>>  
>> Thanks! 
>> Shida
>>  
>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) < <mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com>keith.drage@nokia.com <mailto:keith.drage@nokia.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> In regard to the unblocking of the video document, given that the previous question went to the mailing list, formally I think you should take the unblocking to the mailing list, i.e. ask “Can we now proceed”. Obviously this can only happen when you can point to the formal withdrawal.
>>  
>> Keith
>>  
>> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of EXT Shida Schubert
>> Sent: 07 April 2016 20:34
>> To: xrblock
>> Subject: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> All;
>>  
>> Minutes from the yesterday’s session is available below;
>>  
>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-xrblock <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_95_minutes_minutes-2D95-2Dxrblock&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=Buqlq696G77qgrig8ACRUKLkrM_0RjbUxX1yW0oOA3Y&s=XdEFhql_cVHAuZn1ETafcJ39HtJabyoO3QTyOzKEGRk&e=>
>>  
>> Please advice if anything should be corrected.
>>  
>> Thanks!
>> Shida
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xrblock mailing list
>> xrblock@ietf.org <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>