Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

I’m waiting until the disclosure is withdrawn, at which point I will clear my DISCUSS and approve publication.

I sent Rachel instructions for how to get the disclosure withdrawn. There is some manual process involved.

Alissa

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Alan Clark <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Dan
> 
> As a WG participant I would support the document proceeding after the IPR disclosure has been withdrawn.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alan Clark
> 
> On 4/7/16 4:19 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> Speaking as a contributor, I agree with your point.
>>  
>> As a WG chair and document shepherd – I will raise this issue with the AD. The control belongs to the IESG at this point – this is the way I understand the process (and I may be wrong on this). 
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Dan
>>  
>>  
>> From: Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] 
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:15 PM
>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> If I recall correctly, four people objected to the document proceeding.
>>  
>> Some (including myself) indicated that they would review the position if circumstances changed.
>>  
>> Noone indicated an automatic change of their position on xxxx occurring.
>>  
>> I don’t expect this to take long, but I still think this should be asked, just to ensure there is nothing else lurking.
>>  
>> Keith
>>  
>> From: EXT Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] 
>> Sent: 07 April 2016 21:11
>> To: Shida Schubert; Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: RE: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> Hi,
>>  
>> As far as I understand the process, the document is now owned by the Area Director. She may choose to consult the WG about the way forward, but this is not a mandatory step in the process at this point. 
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Dan
>>  
>>  
>> From: xrblock [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of Shida Schubert
>> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:07 PM
>> To: Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB)
>> Cc: xrblock
>> Subject: Re: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> Keith;
>>  
>> Good point, I will add that to the action item && change “Herald” > “Harald” as noted. 
>>  
>> Thanks! 
>> Shida
>>  
>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Drage, Keith (Nokia - GB) < <mailto:[e-mail]>[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>  
>> In regard to the unblocking of the video document, given that the previous question went to the mailing list, formally I think you should take the unblocking to the mailing list, i.e. ask “Can we now proceed”. Obviously this can only happen when you can point to the formal withdrawal.
>>  
>> Keith
>>  
>> From: xrblock [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of EXT Shida Schubert
>> Sent: 07 April 2016 20:34
>> To: xrblock
>> Subject: [xrblock] Minutes from the mtg
>>  
>> All;
>>  
>> Minutes from the yesterday’s session is available below;
>>  
>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-xrblock <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_95_minutes_minutes-2D95-2Dxrblock&d=BQMFaQ&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=Buqlq696G77qgrig8ACRUKLkrM_0RjbUxX1yW0oOA3Y&s=XdEFhql_cVHAuZn1ETafcJ39HtJabyoO3QTyOzKEGRk&e=>
>>  
>> Please advice if anything should be corrected.
>>  
>> Thanks!
>> Shida
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> xrblock mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>