IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Thu, 22 December 2011 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F4621F8BAD for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kf8BlwhgQsmD for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6545421F8BB8 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so5404555iae.31 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2WuPrP66FAfc4tQ0AytkKmWsc+SGPJzT9BzB6Al6Fh4=; b=CwnMaZIGjOBjbNnLeYyp1bPBwic2od6+hoKiuKhf5LYiyFfegAPmd6uKXn72Ef8gjd XEKeeidNYy9uWdJhdhytrZBlnisBYj2hg8oiw3vDiZvuzP2UYLPgbdfArwicIbgtAHde Hy7oyU9/wTlmgER4jb5W8r4zaXqzC0eJiHPRc=
Received: by 10.42.72.135 with SMTP id o7mr10734203icj.45.1324546727994; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-115-87-123-135.revip4.asianet.co.th. [115.87.123.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g34sm27169914ibk.10.2011.12.22.01.38.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EF2FA9F.7060902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:38:39 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
References: <E7B79540-9CB5-4E4F-B32B-5FB9960398B4@ntt-at.com> <BLU0-SMTP71FCECF974E61D4D10BBF2D0A50@phx.gbl> <20111222.141425.218198835.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20111222.141425.218198835.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:38:49 -0000

On 12/22/2011 12:14 PM, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:

>> There is still work to be done, but I support adopting
>> draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-06 as a WG item.
> 
> Same opinion.

I agree; as I have stated multiple times, there is no need for any
process of "merging" (except, possibly of author lists) these drafts to
make progress; the only thing needed is adoption of one or the other (or
none, for that matter) as a WG document and the use of the consensus
process to produce a final document from that point.  Maybe I haven't
been clear enough on that point, however, so let me make it crystalline:
can we stop wasting time and effort on non-WG documents and get to work
on something real, PLEASE?

...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email