Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item

Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca> Wed, 21 December 2011 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318FB21F8B09 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:44:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.063
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.063 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlvCs2XehCsD for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63A321F8B06 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP71 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:44:56 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [70.54.91.49]
X-Originating-Email: [coverdale@sympatico.ca]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP71FCECF974E61D4D10BBF2D0A50@phx.gbl>
Received: from PaulNewPC ([70.54.91.49]) by BLU0-SMTP71.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:44:55 -0800
From: Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
To: 'Shida Schubert' <shida@ntt-at.com>, xrblock@ietf.org
References: <E7B79540-9CB5-4E4F-B32B-5FB9960398B4@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7B79540-9CB5-4E4F-B32B-5FB9960398B4@ntt-at.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:44:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acy+RSM7kTI8CLwgQSOZM+16fEIlHQB47IcA
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2011 21:44:55.0269 (UTC) FILETIME=[C70E3150:01CCC029]
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:44:58 -0000

There is still work to be done, but I support adopting
draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-06 as a WG item.

Paul Coverdale

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
>Behalf Of Shida Schubert
>Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 6:55 AM
>To: xrblock@ietf.org
>Subject: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item
>
>
> This is a call to see whether people are happy
>with the latest xr-quality-monitoring-06 draft for addressing
>the milestone "QoE Metrics Reporting".
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-
>06
>
> xr-que-00 which used to be an AVT draft also addresses
>the same milestone.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clark-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-00.txt
>
> The xr-quality-monitoring-06 claims to merge the two
>into one.
>
> Please response to express your option for the followings.
>
> 1. Adopt the draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-06 as a WG
>item.
>
> 2. Not ready to adopt.
>   * Would be very helpful if you provide your reasonings.
>
> Regards
>  Shida (as chair)
>_______________________________________________
>xrblock mailing list
>xrblock@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock