IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Thu, 22 December 2011 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E0B11E80EB for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:14:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PX5RCP+7jPSl for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A2B11E8096 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dhcp-143-200.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.143.200]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5466627806A; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:14:26 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:14:25 +0900
Message-Id: <20111222.141425.218198835.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: coverdale@sympatico.ca
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP71FCECF974E61D4D10BBF2D0A50@phx.gbl>
References: <E7B79540-9CB5-4E4F-B32B-5FB9960398B4@ntt-at.com> <BLU0-SMTP71FCECF974E61D4D10BBF2D0A50@phx.gbl>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:14:31 -0000

> There is still work to be done, but I support adopting
> draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-06 as a WG item.

Same opinion.

Regards,
--
Hitoshi Asaeda


> Paul Coverdale
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>Behalf Of Shida Schubert
>>Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 6:55 AM
>>To: xrblock@ietf.org
>>Subject: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item
>>
>>
>> This is a call to see whether people are happy
>>with the latest xr-quality-monitoring-06 draft for addressing
>>the milestone "QoE Metrics Reporting".
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-
>>06
>>
>> xr-que-00 which used to be an AVT draft also addresses
>>the same milestone.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clark-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-00.txt
>>
>> The xr-quality-monitoring-06 claims to merge the two
>>into one.
>>
>> Please response to express your option for the followings.
>>
>> 1. Adopt the draft-wu-xrblock-rtcp-xr-quality-monitoring-06 as a WG
>>item.
>>
>> 2. Not ready to adopt.
>>   * Would be very helpful if you provide your reasonings.
>>
>> Regards
>>  Shida (as chair)
>>_______________________________________________
>>xrblock mailing list
>>xrblock@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email