Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED4C21F8ECB for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8v3O9-jvJuo for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7713621F8EBC for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 07:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p60so2887085wes.7 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=f8eOwFwjLZz4yGDk5L0n5KpumCdy2WGwzbGQMLiE6dg=; b=SMPhLQN2FXfuU+uKKJwm/3SgdzA6slhjogzqf0mQwhzS3V6SR9pilTDbHl96xvlZoN bbR8/YLVCQ5o5gymJSGYxB2PaGe+1hYWZaH6Y7NJxi64r3XtJKyBFru0qL7VbrdQnFGs 3xt4t2IdqG5mS2yk21k2W4+0pFEFqJXrRb0k2i+LkC+glcrzpxd10rgoq/z4zEzpdcxx +V6sRT/H3oCzkFlzcIWLwNcGvxgST1UBagiK2f+ZyX3/ApyhLC0Lo4nsTzW7KsHT7uQn YxcAO0DsavQHnYrtMW6VvBDShPR89pYUTxtbDREikaJQCkuMT1tyWpeZkGMVsDjsGCfC 4foA==
X-Received: by 10.194.248.200 with SMTP id yo8mr18445578wjc.36.1368108925349; Thu, 09 May 2013 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-181-177-28.red.bezeqint.net. [79.181.177.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nf9sm15775622wic.3.2013.05.09.07.15.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 May 2013 07:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Shida Schubert'" <shida@ntt-at.com>, "'xrblock'" <xrblock@ietf.org>
References: <BA5D79A3-15E9-4038-851F-C4A37A638D25@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <BA5D79A3-15E9-4038-851F-C4A37A638D25@ntt-at.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:14:35 +0300
Message-ID: <01cc01ce4cbf$8aa27450$9fe75cf0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01CD_01CE4CD8.AFF04890"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJaaNKMUfnTOsgq3JBpXxYuv9fH/ZfkrKiQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'xrblock-chairs' <xrblock-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:15:35 -0000

Hi,

I reviewed the latest version. It looks OK.

I have one comment

The "reserved" field in section 3.2 should be 8 bits since the "I" field was
removed.

Another option is to keep the "I" field and say that it should be ignored

Roni Even

 

From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Shida Schubert
Sent: 08 May, 2013 4:56 AM
To: xrblock
Cc: xrblock-chairs
Subject: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization

 

 This is an announcement of a 2 weeks XRBLOCK WG last call on 
"Report Block for Synchronization Delay and Offset Metrics Reporting" 
priort o requesting publication of the document as a proposed standard. 

 

 As per discussion at the last meeting, we are running a second 

WGLC on this draft.


Please send your comments, including nits, to the list by the

22nd of May

If you read the draft and you see no issues, concerns, or nits, please
express the fact that you have no issue progressing the draft on the
list as well. 

The latest version can be found here:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-synchronization-04.txt

Regards

Shida as co-chair