IETF Logo Mail Archive

[xrblock] FW: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C71F11E819D for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0owyebBGgYcD for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114FD11E81A1 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AWI14205; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:36:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:36:00 +0100
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:36:30 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.198]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:36:25 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
Thread-Index: Ac6ec09GHHfi6gZPQpu/64wywp7WoQAiCAdAAAcs6/AAAIkbUA==
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:36:24 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43BB2DA1@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [xrblock] FW: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:36:45 -0000

Hi, Rachel:
It is up to future definition. Without future use, we will reserve this 6 bit fields.
That is what it said in the draft.

Regards!
-Qin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huangyihong (Rachel) [mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:07 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have read this draft and believe it's in good shape. I have only one
> minor comment:
> 
> In the section 3.2
> "
> Reserved: 6 bits
> 
>       This field is reserved for future definition.  In the absence of
>       such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and
>       ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2).
> 
> "
> 
> In What kind of case such a definition will be absent?
> 
> Best regards,
> Rachel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:36 PM
> To: xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is the second WGLC for the Internet-Draft 'RTP Control Protocol
> (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MoS Metric Reporting' previously
> known as 'RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for
> QoE Metric Reporting'. Please send your comments, questions, and
> concerns to the WG list before Wednesday 9/4. If you have no comments or
> questions and you believe that this document is ready for submission to
> the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard, please send a message
> stating this.
> 
> The latest version of the document can be retrieved from
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10.txt.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email