Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe

Hi,Dan:
Thanks for your proposed change.
The change looks good to me.

Regards!
-Qin
-----Original Message-----
From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:23 PM
To: Huangyihong (Rachel); xrblock@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe

I think that what is meant here is that until a future usage of this field is defined the transmitter and receiver must have the behavior indicated in section 4.2 of RFC 6709 for reserved fields. 

Maybe it would be more clear: 

OLD: 

Reserved: 6 bits

      This field is reserved for future definition.  In the absence of
      such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and
      ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2).

NEW: 

Reserved: 6 bits

      This field is reserved for future use.  Until future use is 
      defined, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero at 
      transmission and ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2).

Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huangyihong (Rachel) [mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:07 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have read this draft and believe it's in good shape. I have only one
> minor comment:
> 
> In the section 3.2
> "
> Reserved: 6 bits
> 
>       This field is reserved for future definition.  In the absence of
>       such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and
>       ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2).
> 
> "
> 
> In What kind of case such a definition will be absent?
> 
> Best regards,
> Rachel
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:36 PM
> To: xrblock@ietf.org
> Subject: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is the second WGLC for the Internet-Draft 'RTP Control Protocol
> (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MoS Metric Reporting' previously
> known as 'RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for
> QoE Metric Reporting'. Please send your comments, questions, and
> concerns to the WG list before Wednesday 9/4. If you have no comments or
> questions and you believe that this document is ready for submission to
> the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard, please send a message
> stating this.
> 
> The latest version of the document can be retrieved from
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10.txt.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock