Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 10:33 UTC
Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD94A11E819B for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VO9fWE16ZP9v for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7724211E80ED for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AUP79609; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:33:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:32:42 +0100
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:33:07 +0100
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.198]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:33:01 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "xrblock@ietf.org" <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
Thread-Index: Ac6ec09GHHfi6gZPQpu/64wywp7WoQAiCAdAAAcs6/AAAJ5W4AAAOwJgAAGv29A=
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:33:00 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4588A044@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B4B0F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB45889FDE@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B569A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4588A020@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B5722@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B5722@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:33:41 -0000
Yes. I didn't read it carefully. And after your clarification, I understand the authors' intention. I think the changes you made are clearer than the old one. But I'm also okay to keep the old one. Best regards, Rachel -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:40 PM To: Huangyihong (Rachel); xrblock@ietf.org Subject: RE: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe It's up to the editor actually, from my perspective the text was correct, maybe not very clear. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Huangyihong (Rachel) [mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:37 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe > > Hi Dan, > > The change clears my concern. Thanks. > > Best regards, > Rachel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:23 PM > To: Huangyihong (Rachel); xrblock@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe > > I think that what is meant here is that until a future usage of this > field is defined the transmitter and receiver must have the behavior > indicated in section 4.2 of RFC 6709 for reserved fields. > > Maybe it would be more clear: > > OLD: > > Reserved: 6 bits > > This field is reserved for future definition. In the absence of > such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero and > ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2). > > NEW: > > Reserved: 6 bits > > This field is reserved for future use. Until future use is > defined, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero at > transmission and ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section > 4.2). > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Huangyihong (Rachel) [mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:07 AM > > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); xrblock@ietf.org > > Subject: [xrblock]RE: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe > > > > Hi, > > > > I have read this draft and believe it's in good shape. I have only one > > minor comment: > > > > In the section 3.2 > > " > > Reserved: 6 bits > > > > This field is reserved for future definition. In the absence of > > such a definition, the bits in this field MUST be set to zero > and > > ignored by the receiver (See RFC6709 section 4.2). > > > > " > > > > In What kind of case such a definition will be absent? > > > > Best regards, > > Rachel > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xrblock-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:36 PM > > To: xrblock@ietf.org > > Subject: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe > > > > Hi, > > > > This is the second WGLC for the Internet-Draft 'RTP Control Protocol > > (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MoS Metric Reporting' > > previously known as 'RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) > > Blocks for QoE Metric Reporting'. Please send your comments, > > questions, and concerns to the WG list before Wednesday 9/4. If you > > have no comments or questions and you believe that this document is > > ready for submission to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed > > Standard, please send a message stating this. > > > > The latest version of the document can be retrieved from > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-10.txt. > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xrblock mailing list > > xrblock@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Roni Even
- [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [xrblock] FW: 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Roni Even
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Roni Even
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Colin Perkins
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Colin Perkins
- Re: [xrblock] 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-xrblock-rtc… Qin Wu