IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Mon, 25 November 2013 01:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655881AE34C for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4fh68xRmmBz for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F80B1AE209 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AYG68634; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:15:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:15:35 +0000
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:15:56 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:15:43 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
Thread-Index: AQHO5yrH8BYNgc/HdEGJAHWQhW4mSJo1KUYQ
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:15:41 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB4590501E@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12942832@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <CE19BFAB-9BAB-4EB5-B6CB-455F697E616A@csperkins.org> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C5DAD9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C5DAD9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.94]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock mailing list <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:16:53 -0000

Support as co-author.

Best regards,
Rachel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 10:08 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert
> Cc: xrblock mailing list
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-
> xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
> 
> I support adoption of this work.
> Overloading the existing semantics of post repair RLE loss block seems
> not necessary.
> 
> Regards!
> -Qin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin
> Perkins
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: xrblock mailing list
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-
> xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
> 
> Dan, Shida,
> 
> On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:30, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> wrote:
> > During the xrblock WG meeting at IETF-88 there was consensus in the
> room to adopt draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count as a WG item.
> The chairs would like to confirm this consensus on the list. Please
> express your support or reservations about adopting this item as a WG
> charter item and adding it to the WG charter, with a delivery date
> before IETF-90 (July 2014).
> >
> > Please respond to this call for adoption before Sunday, December 1st.
> 
> The RTCP XR and SDP extensions in the draft look sensible to me, and
> are potentially useful. Accordingly, I support adoption.
> 
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email