IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 22 November 2013 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212311AC7F1 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:08:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7jUBaVMMIQ4T for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92441A1F19 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BAO70846; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:08:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:08:04 +0000
Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:08:17 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:08:10 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
Thread-Index: AQHO5yewIPHec/Y68Ue6dPOjz0V+Ig==
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:08:09 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C5DAD9@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12942832@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <CE19BFAB-9BAB-4EB5-B6CB-455F697E616A@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <CE19BFAB-9BAB-4EB5-B6CB-455F697E616A@csperkins.org>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock mailing list <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:08:33 -0000

I support adoption of this work.
Overloading the existing semantics of post repair RLE loss block seems not necessary.

Regards!
-Qin
-----Original Message-----
From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: xrblock mailing list
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count

Dan, Shida,

On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:30, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> During the xrblock WG meeting at IETF-88 there was consensus in the room to adopt draft-huang-xrblock-post-repair-loss-count as a WG item. The chairs would like to confirm this consensus on the list. Please express your support or reservations about adopting this item as a WG charter item and adding it to the WG charter, with a delivery date before IETF-90 (July 2014). 
> 
> Please respond to this call for adoption before Sunday, December 1st. 

The RTCP XR and SDP extensions in the draft look sensible to me, and are potentially useful. Accordingly, I support adoption. 

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/



_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email