Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 22 November 2013 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9471AD986 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEBp87o6blWA for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64CF1AD0F0 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:03:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BAO70626; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:02:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:02:39 +0000
Received: from nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.38) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:02:54 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.56]) by nkgeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:02:49 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
Thread-Index: AQHO5ybxXM++zMen40eu4XVoT+vTXg==
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:02:48 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA43C5DAC7@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA12942822@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <6328F8B8-65DF-4DB1-ADE9-1CCDECFEC573@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <6328F8B8-65DF-4DB1-ADE9-1CCDECFEC573@csperkins.org>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: xrblock mailing list <xrblock@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 02:03:10 -0000

Support as a coauthor.

-----Original Message-----
From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: xrblock mailing list
Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability

Dan, Shida,

On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:29, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> During the xrblock WG meeting at IETF-88 there was consensus in the room to adopt draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability as a WG item. The chairs would like to confirm this consensus on the list. Please express your support or reservations about adopting this item as a WG charter item and adding it to the WG charter, with a delivery date before IETF-90 (July 2014). 
> 
> Please respond to this call for adoption before Sunday, December 1st. 


The RTCP XR and SDP extensions in the draft look sensible to me, and the MPEG experts at the meeting seemed to believe the statistics were useful. This draft therefore seems like a reasonable thing to be published, so I support adoption.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/



_______________________________________________
xrblock mailing list
xrblock@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock