Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability

Support as co-author.

Best regards,
Rachel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 10:03 AM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Shida Schubert
> Cc: xrblock mailing list
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item -draft-bi-xrblock-
> rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
> 
> Support as a coauthor.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Colin
> Perkins
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:38 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: xrblock mailing list
> Subject: Re: [xrblock] call for adoption as WG item - draft-bi-xrblock-
> rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability
> 
> Dan, Shida,
> 
> On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:29, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> wrote:
> > During the xrblock WG meeting at IETF-88 there was consensus in the
> room to adopt draft-bi-xrblock-rtcp-xr-psi-dep-decodability as a WG
> item. The chairs would like to confirm this consensus on the list.
> Please express your support or reservations about adopting this item as
> a WG charter item and adding it to the WG charter, with a delivery date
> before IETF-90 (July 2014).
> >
> > Please respond to this call for adoption before Sunday, December 1st.
> 
> 
> The RTCP XR and SDP extensions in the draft look sensible to me, and
> the MPEG experts at the meeting seemed to believe the statistics were
> useful. This draft therefore seems like a reasonable thing to be
> published, so I support adoption.
> 
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock
> _______________________________________________
> xrblock mailing list
> xrblock@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock