IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] preliminary -- draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation

Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 14 August 2009 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9558A3A6D67 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A+oxLJWoX9tC for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D7C3A6C0E for <yam@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ppp-68-120-198-98.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.120.198.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7E0u4aY010391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:56:09 -0700
Message-ID: <4A84B618.5010900@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:55:52 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4A848309.8020107@dcrocker.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20090813155433.02c2d2a8@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20090813155433.02c2d2a8@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:08:39 -0700
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] preliminary -- draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:56:08 -0000

SM wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> At 14:18 13-08-2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> With some feedback about the form, I'll try to fold changes back into 
>> the master
>> xml template.
> 
> The master XML template is available for download at 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/yam/trac/wiki
> 
> Is the "Confidence document meets RFC 2026" item optional from a format 
> point of view or should it be included for every pre-evaluation?

There's no track-record of this sort of activity, for us t know what reallyh is 
required versus is optional.

On the other hand, this one entry would seem to me to be the single most 
important information for getting to Full, so I'd recommend including it in 
every template.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email