Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submit-pre-evaluation-00.txt
Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 29 June 2010 20:44 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9CA3A6968 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.264, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxEI4dBq+AdH for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail167.messagelabs.com (mail167.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFBC3A696C for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-167.messagelabs.com!1277844282!21511236!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146]
Received: (qmail 30753 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2010 20:44:43 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-5.tower-167.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Jun 2010 20:44:43 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5TKiJZC013759 for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:44:19 -0400
Received: from klpd017.kcdc.att.com (klpd017.kcdc.att.com [135.188.40.86]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5TKiGR0013730 for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:44:16 -0400
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5TKidip018049 for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:44:39 -0500
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5TKiVjc017935 for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:44:31 -0500
Received: from [135.70.25.139] (vpn-135-70-25-139.vpn.west.att.com[135.70.25.139]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20100629204430gw100s4p11e> (Authid: tony); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:44:30 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.25.139]
Message-ID: <4C2A5B2C.6060206@att.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:44:28 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: yam@ietf.org
References: <20100629050001.786D13A697F@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100629050001.786D13A697F@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submit-pre-evaluation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:44:35 -0000
Nice work Randall.
Under section 2.3 Implementation and Operational Experience, it might be
worth mentioning that industry groups such as MAAWG explicitly recommend
the use of Submit instead of port 25.
That's the only item I thought of as I read it.
Tony Hansen
tony@att.com
On 6/29/2010 1:00 AM, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Yet Another Mail Working Group of the IETF.
>
>
> Title : Preliminary Evaluation of RFC 4409 "Message Submission for Mail", for advancement from Draft Standard to Full Standard by the YAM Working Group
> Author(s) : R. Gellens
> Filename : draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submit-pre-evaluation-00.txt
> Pages : 6
> Date : 2010-06-27
>
> This memo is a preliminary evaluation of RFC 4409 "Message Submission
> for Mail" for advancement from Draft to Full Standard. It has been
> prepared by the The Yet Another Mail Working Group.
- [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submit-pr… Internet-Drafts
- Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submi… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [yam] I-D Action:draft-ietf-yam-4409bis-submi… Tony Hansen