IETF Logo Mail Archive

[yang-doctors] guideline for enum and value?

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC6F12D868 for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:18:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xh9-e0QKcKZN for <yang-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:18:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA7412E877 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:18:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=256; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516868328; x=1518077928; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=oIPzOekB5Jrc5zaqyeskXtbtLsZhnd4nDqBW5tYBWJY=; b=DhmdYZhQ86JQ4zQbOI/o9BR1g9MyI70eEtdtwL05YnUKG6zf1kjCWReJ 9uhbZJvcoA0Tl+uKINDhGI3kfJwuy90DbLm4dtk8mm8b48I5s2RUj8StI vT7OtBplcgkQsFsPy205M2qbUYoDEuL5JoUhQPacFa7GHPTV/W3tsj2iJ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BwAQChkmla/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYUchASLGKdOggIKixgUAQEBAQEBAQECayiFTRV2AiYCXw0IAQGKMaUdkBmCJ4pgAQEIAiaBD4NCg2yCEYdvg0+CZQWkCZViggIBiiiHeo9FiBOBPDYigVAzGggbFYJohFdAjwIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,411,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="1588691"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jan 2018 08:18:28 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0P8IRKB004499 for <yang-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:18:28 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <c3d21c6e-8cc0-e109-4b81-278242d70071@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:18:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/6LOEPw5co5kccAMdr0YWnEm4xJM>
Subject: [yang-doctors] guideline for enum and value?
X-BeenThere: yang-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email list of the yang-doctors directorate <yang-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/yang-doctors/>
List-Post: <mailto:yang-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors>, <mailto:yang-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:18:50 -0000

Dear all,

Still busy with the RFC6087bis AD review, reviewing the enum sections now.

Do I recall correctly a guideline about not using "value" in enum?
Something to be inserted in RFC6087bis? At least a pros and cons discussion?

Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email