Re: [rfc-i] can we just drop the disclaimer that seems to have appeared?Re: [rfc-i] can we just drop the disclaimer that seems to have appeared?
Brian E Carpenter
2019-10-02
rfc-interest
None
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/fqJT4mGB04f4fvyozIzwottca7c/
2786495
1860181
Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2019-06-11
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/QNEpn_rAy4vPkxwziSRJZbOiIHc/
2740282
1843841
Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
Michael Richardson
2019-06-08
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/4RAmU-XtzPyibRAX-fO3fOjSQwQ/
2739836
1843841
Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
Carsten Bormann
2019-06-08
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/Farc1Vlqu82l_yzrUJcHJSkZAQY/
2739754
1843841
Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)Re: draft-klensin-newtrk-8540style-harmful (and (and draft-roach-bis-documents-, etc.)
Brian E Carpenter
2019-06-08
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/3WNjcna_LDO0PO4tcf3A3aIQyZI/
2739719
1843841
Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” headerRe: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
Brian E Carpenter
2018-09-14
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/p5xSMYcSgUwVh6eNGVkqG6GvDY0/
2631777
1804232
Re: [Rfcplusplus] If it ain't broke ...Re: [Rfcplusplus] If it ain't broke ...
Brian E Carpenter
2018-06-08
rfcplusplus
None
/arch/msg/rfcplusplus/rWOKhb5JLn-Pssl4bR2e_oI62EM/
2592374
1788538
Re: I-D Action: draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00.txtRe: I-D Action: draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00.txt
Brian E Carpenter
2016-03-02
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/7tNKPAhfg5BncNJxA2I00YwSDJs/
2166111
1339163
Re: [dhcwg] ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard]Re: [dhcwg] ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard]
Spencer Dawkins at IETF
2016-02-23
dhcwg
None
/arch/msg/dhcwg/rEhgxTXtL3KidjsLJonVUgnmG_Q/
2163075
1112515
ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard]ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard]
Brian E Carpenter
2016-02-23
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/ughf0cnk_Z8KpPPbLPudL159_rM/
2162733
1339179
[dhcwg] ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard][dhcwg] ISDs [was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard]
Brian E Carpenter
2016-02-23
dhcwg
None
/arch/msg/dhcwg/rm6gLWHpBJt2Ro5rEk1NfDNE_zM/
2162734
1112515
Re: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLCRe: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC
mohamed.boucadair
2015-12-03
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/zNXxj8O4CzoBQqVlx5W1YKY7LxU/
2124173
1659447
Re: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLCRe: [v6ops] draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis WGLC
Brian E Carpenter
2015-12-03
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/9y6cPgchaT0_DG-dk7n2H4Uyyc0/
2124025
1659447
Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levelsRe: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
John C Klensin
2011-09-11
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/wY4gw0a3fR7k9u1yes_GFReMIW4/
637557
1342427
RE: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis)RE: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis)
Ross Callon
2010-11-05
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/O5nF29Oi7opXLID4m2j_wZrD8CM/
632737
1342412
RE: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis)RE: No single problem... (was Re: what is the problem bis)
John C Klensin
2010-11-05
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/g20lKrkrVf_sZ4EawrK-F1PgM1I/
632736
1342412
Re: [NEWTRK] An updated ISD proposalRe: [NEWTRK] An updated ISD proposal
Douglas Otis
2010-07-15
newtrk
None
/arch/msg/newtrk/ZegGfxYD3EL_CahysHpWoq4sG58/
1048258
1517505
Re: [NEWTRK] An updated ISD proposalRe: [NEWTRK] An updated ISD proposal
Brian E Carpenter
2010-07-15
newtrk
None
/arch/msg/newtrk/JxRBDAOosFO08MKujWGYkoxNXOI/
1048257
1517505
Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322Re: [yam] Referencing 1652bis and update to RFC 5321/5322
John C Klensin
2010-07-06
yam
None
/arch/msg/yam/MfyJ5lQhVsvRzWbcweZSc4N5BUo/
1538599
1676197
I-D Action:draft-klensin-isdbis-00.txtI-D Action:draft-klensin-isdbis-00.txt
Internet-Drafts
2010-07-05
i-d-announce
None
/arch/msg/i-d-announce/Fpk4JB1g5EOHTKEVnxACOiyWePw/
530230
1211493
An updated ISD proposalAn updated ISD proposal
John C Klensin
2010-07-05
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/rfsBiEJnKRP7-BmninMjlaUp8f4/
630553
1342608