IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 11 September 2011 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350F221F8781 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXrviVc5-vkX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C5521F84D1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1R2aIO-000IlE-Mg; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:01:24 -0400
X-Vipre-Scanned: 01025D5B0028C401025EA8-TDI
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:01:23 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Message-ID: <DBCFB277196F7F1ADFF3FC4D@[192.168.1.128]>
In-Reply-To: <4E6C21CD.6080000@gmail.com>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E6147D4.2020204@santronics.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C352657343@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110906161108.GI31240@shinkuro.com> <CEDD8840-BE2D-405E-872A-271C25A9A59D@network-heretics.com> <01O5QFMUPV8S014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <96633252-503F-4DCD-B6FD-B6B9DEA1FC66@network-heretics.com> <01O5RIOBEGP0014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <201109100133.p8A1XFvS003894@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <3E9E22D3-9C4B-48CF-A0F1-BACD219AF582@standardstrack.com> <4E6C21CD.6080000@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: IETF list discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:59:29 -0000

--On Sunday, September 11, 2011 14:49 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2011-09-11 13:26, Eric Burger wrote:
>> So should we move to a one-step process?
> 
> There is a detailed proposal for that at
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-a
> ll-01.txt
> 
> I don't think the arguments have changed much since 2006.

Well, yes and no.

To some extent, that proposal evolved into
draft-ietf-newtrk-repurposing-isd which, without John Loughney's
direct involvement, evolved into draft-klensin-isdbis.  Both of
those can be construed as "one level and explanation" proposals,
rather than "multiple levels and trying to make the situation
fit the categories" ones.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email