IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 26 October 2010 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA45A3A692B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ap-omobrRjzc for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64893A68BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net (184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net [184.200.45.132]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 4.1.8-GA) with ESMTP id CIB25952 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:48 -0700
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC5CE36.5020503@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:30:50 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5BAFF938-C0C4-4C23-BA33-E6834DA4B493@network-heretics.com>
References: <20070.1278510136@erosen-linux> <4C3498CF.90206@dcrocker.net> <4C349E0E.7030904@gmx.de> <4C349ED8.6080706@bbiw.net> <4C7EB142.3030209@vigilsec.com> <4CA54E97.9050208@gmail.com> <201010010314.o913EZob020650@sj-core-3.cisco.com> <4CA557A2.5050002@gmail.com> <4CC5CE36.5020503@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:29:33 -0000

I'm against it.  I think it's a step in the wrong direction.

Keith

On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Russ Housley wrote:

> I'd like to hear from the community about pushing forward with this
> proposal or dropping it.
> 
> At least one other proposal was raised.  My reading of this mail list is
> that the proposal in draft-housley-two-maturity-levels has more support.
> 
> Since the -00 cut-off for IETF 79 has passed, I am assuming that no
> other proposals are going to be raised.
> 
> Should I be seeking a sponsor for this draft?
> 
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email