IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 24 January 2011 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA71B3A6917 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:34:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXO0JjoEMRWE for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:34:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31C3A6403 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4279A4783 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:37:28 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sls5nbhPbr4m for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:37:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-96-255-143-234.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.143.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B07A9A471B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:37:27 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101027171037.GB3162@nsn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:37:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63DD35D1-1C25-401D-8C05-992A2D11E3DE@vigilsec.com>
References: <4B803580-664C-42B3-92A7-712452F12BA3@gmail.com> <01NTJJR8423E000CVY@mauve.mrochek.com> <20101027171037.GB3162@nsn.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:34:16 -0000

draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-03 was just posted.  It reflects much of the discussion on this thread over the last few months.  In particular, it embraces the changes put forward in the recent proposal by Dave Crocker, Eric Burger, Peter Saint-Andre, and Spencer Dawkins.  Please take a look at the revised document, and provide your thoughts.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email