IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Other proposals (Was: :Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 03 September 2011 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FA721F8C3D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 03:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-XT-d2PvA3z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 03:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF6D21F8C33 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 03:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p83Akpui005598; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 03:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1315046816; bh=E+yWOzhTiJlR02sxWIp3/X2cM/s9tJY8BlAU2d3LS0g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=TKFledgJQXq21aWkSiiH1XSxkWN4E66Vv5f6UHGbBuiFKC1T7M/x0EfBd0HQgIMNs KAvnL2gSlxoorn+SLcJAvubtT9RHdmvOD3bDSxiQYkHayRDBsBjOfRrTyG2UlcKyu8 0XEZt8sRMKmIPu1Ol7zfyqI6D0nvOMDy4KJICNPo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1315046816; bh=E+yWOzhTiJlR02sxWIp3/X2cM/s9tJY8BlAU2d3LS0g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=WFazNjLCASp5ox1WDABetchrd8OsZu8r65XePUb8blrJTiBn77wTbGy37vD1LblfV wkC/QhfyHuiMEB9msB+JpbBgr1ZJWlFDKx8j/gsRbVqjcvGOjloqHgaEdNqWygSvMF 6VKUg5/6QHKG+Vjnl+VKieyoErM0JUye0I+wDb0E=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110903023017.0ac9b6d0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:45:01 -0700
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Other proposals (Was: :Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)
In-Reply-To: <4E615346.6050402@piuha.net>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E615346.6050402@piuha.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:45:25 -0000

Hi Jari,
At 15:05 02-09-2011, Jari Arkko wrote:
>But what I really wanted to say here was a response to your concern 
>about those proposals to do something else. Let me just state this 
>clearly. I know I would be VERY happy to sponsor many different 
>kinds of improvement proposals. In sequence or in parallel with the 
>current proposal. I'm already sponsoring another one (though it is 
>destined to an IESG statement and somewhat related to this one, but 
>it could have been something else too). I think I'm speaking also 
>for the rest of the IESG in this. Please make the proposals.

I sent you a message off-list.

If I had to reach a conclusion, I'd say: it's one of this situations 
where you can be as fair as it gets but you cannot please 
everybody.  You have put in more that enough effort into this.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email