IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 06 September 2011 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166D221F8E67 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8WeEAnRlYU3k for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F6521F8E62 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7A626FB8; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:58:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:58:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=czt 8vUG0DqGiLIpIaYx0C70cvmA=; b=GOG+Z6HIzj01MDySs2Fj9XjckE15N8gP9+H zeONmbnLrMoy0fWJFpoavjQaI5v5rJMBohd+VaYvS4iTBNaQcppD2lAhdA2IZ8Jy 2Ovq1YyYQkC4ulwbYE6t6h0R2bmoqplfbtTjtGWoE/g03aP3ot3HesBURJ9XTVPa T/t4wBrI=
X-Sasl-enc: T93GDn/RZA1+I+oYU2ZmPZjefKt1aSE1h0DmyJzZ05KH 1315353511
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7908E86118B; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:58:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-13--108623900"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <385B68F2-5299-4E83-BC93-CA2F0694572F@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:58:28 -0400
Message-Id: <533F8E8B-F09E-4CA6-9401-F06E3CB2149E@network-heretics.com>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E6147D4.2020204@santronics.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C352657343@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110906161108.GI31240@shinkuro.com> <CEDD8840-BE2D-405E-872A-271C25A9A59D@network-heretics.com> <01O5QFMUPV8S014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <CA+9kkMBig=Oe=3x=G-8YVsd49buGNWX2vmAY3wj7dVgtjf9p5g@mail.gmail.com> <03319FB4-2D6F-4E23-9C1F-4413A8CDE2B7@network-heretics.com> <CA+9kkMA8as0xnj=PkK5jcXEe6GRXRAxvif4f5MJxg6K=x7oguA@mail.gmail.com> <385B68F2-5299-4E83-BC93-CA2F0694572F@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:56:46 -0000

On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

> I wonder if we would be better off discarding the concept of layers of standards, call PS "Standards track", and instead specify a way to report interoperability tests.

+1.  Perhaps along with periodically updated applicability statements.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email