IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 11 September 2011 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F8721F8A71 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjTMWu1DQjO2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6B021F8A67 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so3938887fxe.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+Y989EVN0UxBn3Gy2YTyVjExZA6wGmxCMgBfRWCAF4=; b=xWN23dLAjMwsRZaY0WWC25TY1qJ4DpSB7hyysnk7X1ueacr7wNLLD2A9YcyI1J23Uk Q3ofJedUuWmkVmZncOQ6w5PNHxfJS+snQ/xBZGepZ9w+cZSZVmliYDGJXZbh/vg99O6i 2/jl+BAjQP7/yr4D4wHP4CREXMBWPXZV9jmko=
Received: by 10.223.42.6 with SMTP id q6mr943986fae.140.1315709399087; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.251.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a19sm5371351fac.6.2011.09.10.19.49.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E6C21CD.6080000@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:49:49 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eric Burger <eburger-l@standardstrack.com>
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E6147D4.2020204@santronics.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C352657343@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110906161108.GI31240@shinkuro.com> <CEDD8840-BE2D-405E-872A-271C25A9A59D@network-heretics.com> <01O5QFMUPV8S014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <96633252-503F-4DCD-B6FD-B6B9DEA1FC66@network-heretics.com> <01O5RIOBEGP0014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <201109100133.p8A1XFvS003894@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <3E9E22D3-9C4B-48CF-A0F1-BACD219AF582@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E9E22D3-9C4B-48CF-A0F1-BACD219AF582@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF list discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:48:02 -0000

On 2011-09-11 13:26, Eric Burger wrote:
> So should we move to a one-step process?

There is a detailed proposal for that at
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all-01.txt

I don't think the arguments have changed much since 2006.

   Brian

> 
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
>> Advancing a spec is done for marketing, political, process and other
>> reasons. E.g., to give a spec more legitimacy. Or to more clear
>> replace an older one. Nothing wrong with that.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email