IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Tue, 26 October 2010 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE40F3A6B69 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WA6vCXY37kf9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.3.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4F3A6C34 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=standardstrack.com; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=p7gr05674kpFjdQlW+fl9sPpAXc0ksXRzgpGYXY0E4Li5vx2zDHSD5FHGrfbsmq7/8i1Ao28pSbe7ZtE6TKjlgCfiyZz5yWsE8jXKI15lni8a7vyuAsX1eMIYmRjFHbu;
Received: from ip68-100-199-8.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.199.8] helo=[192.168.15.134]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1PAXXQ-0008Ng-Ky for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:37:16 -0700
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-32-508632416"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:37:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4CC6224B.5060300@gmail.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20070.1278510136@erosen-linux> <4C3498CF.90206@dcrocker.net> <4C349E0E.7030904@gmx.de> <4C349ED8.6080706@bbiw.net> <4C7EB142.3030209@vigilsec.com> <4CA54E97.9050208@gmail.com> <201010010314.o913EZob020650@sj-core-3.cisco.com> <4CA557A2.5050002@gmail.com> <4CC5CE36.5020503@vigilsec.com> <AANLkTinR+Hps-sWkWWHw4ADJCwdZxz-S8Vj+x793q++V@mail.gmail.com> <4CC6224B.5060300@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <83BE88D9-7FC8-47CF-8215-AD97FD40BE08@standardstrack.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:36:17 -0000

Ever since Proposed Standard became Draft Standard for all practical purposes, might as well make it official.

On Oct 25, 2010, at 8:35 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 2010-10-26 13:22, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>> I'd like to hear from the community about pushing forward with this
>>> proposal or dropping it.
>> 
>> I see disagreement with the proposal, but we'll see disagreement with
>> any proposal.  I see enough support to continue pursuing it, in my
>> opinion, and trying to find a balancing point that enough of us can
>> agree with.
> 
> I am happy to agree to what the draft currently says. We've sliced
> and diced this many times over the years, and this seems very close to the
> least-unpopular view. That's the best we can hope for, imho.
> 
>    Brian
> 
>> 
>> I'd like to see work continue.
>> 
>> Barry
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email