Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 06 September 2011 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9154721F8F61 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJk-vdtj6pfA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C189221F8F59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D3127EFC; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:55:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:55:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=zYL hlmlmz+ei8tjerkrusrBoce8=; b=BgxD+UGd7dzr48qMnsn62Gisf0EgpuHjCfq SSiPxCciX6ZIw0VhnzzACaVNZCNG5yZzMJGRVcXmYdEHFWXFD104xpyJfGgWwYIl 6YwKy2G+oEFIx+V4BU7Vj4mwqeWxF98HlQLQSpHOkcC2uG/RyX4syRqssOKKwur0 EoNOVfeg=
X-Sasl-enc: tdvVkR78IWaZ51A/XPNQHyvF+r+Le23dV/7N+TTQQidK 1315353322
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 20B5B861173; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:55:20 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-11--108813049"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA8as0xnj=PkK5jcXEe6GRXRAxvif4f5MJxg6K=x7oguA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:55:19 -0400
Message-Id: <B17E5F5A-4827-42D5-8EC0-4F5EECFD10DD@network-heretics.com>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E6147D4.2020204@santronics.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C352657343@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110906161108.GI31240@shinkuro.com> <CEDD8840-BE2D-405E-872A-271C25A9A59D@network-heretics.com> <01O5QFMUPV8S014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <CA+9kkMBig=Oe=3x=G-8YVsd49buGNWX2vmAY3wj7dVgtjf9p5g@mail.gmail.com> <03319FB4-2D6F-4E23-9C1F-4413A8CDE2B7@network-heretics.com> <CA+9kkMA8as0xnj=PkK5jcXEe6GRXRAxvif4f5MJxg6K=x7oguA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:53:36 -0000

On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> but it means we are changing out a standard that doesn't accurately reflect what we do now for one that doesn't accurately reflect what we will do.  

Yup.   And IMO we're better off with the old incorrect statement than a new one.  At least with the current situation a great many people know how things work.

Keith